IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/issbrf/ib2018-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How Is the Mortality Gap Affecting Social Security Progressivity?

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew S. Rutledge

Abstract

Over the last half-century, average life expectancy at age 65 in the United States has increased by six years for men and four years for women. But these gains have been unequal across the population. While those with greater earnings and education have enjoyed substantially longer life spans, those with lower socioeconomic status (SES) have seen relatively small improvements in their late-life mortality. The unequal increase in life expectancy works against the progressive benefit design of Social Security. The program is set up to award more generous benefits – relative to pre-retirement earnings – to lower earners. But, due to the gap in life expectancy by SES, lower earners receive their benefits for relatively fewer years than their longer-lived counterparts. This brief reviews research by the Social Security Administration’s Retirement Research Consortium and others that investigates this widening gap and examines its consequences. The discussion proceeds as follows. The first section quantifies the growing gap in life expectancy by SES. The second section reviews evidence on why the gap has widened. The third section discusses how the gap affects lifetime Social Security benefits and the progressivity of the system. The final section concludes that, over time, the increasing mortality gap has significantly reduced Social Security’s progressivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew S. Rutledge, 2018. "How Is the Mortality Gap Affecting Social Security Progressivity?," Issues in Brief ib2018-16, Center for Retirement Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2018-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://crr.bc.edu/briefs/how-is-the-mortality-gap-affecting-social-security-progressivity/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2018-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.