IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/issbrf/ib2011-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does Medicare Part D Protect the Elderly from Financial Risk?

Author

Listed:
  • Gary V. Engelhardt
  • Jonathan Gruber

Abstract

The Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 added the Part D prescription drug benefit to the Medicare program. This addition, which became effective in 2006, increased Medicare program costs by more than 10 percent in order to provide, for the first time, prescription drug coverage to enrollees. Part D has since enrolled a sizeable share of elders and now pays for a large percentage of their prescriptions. Despite the program’s size and importance, however, little is known about its effectiveness. One way to measure its success is to determine to what extent it provides financial security to elders. If Part D covers prescription drug spending that was putting older Americans at financial risk, it may result in large social gains. If it simply substitutes for – or “crowds out” – existing insurance arrangements, the social gains may be much smaller. Beyond a crowd-out analysis, a full evaluation of Part D also needs to consider other social benefits and costs, such as the potential health benefits and the efficiency costs of subsidizing drug coverage. The study summarized in this brief evaluates Part D’s impact using the 2002-5 and 2007 waves of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) before and right after the program’s implementation. The brief is organized as follows. The first section presents background on Part D. The second section describes the MEPS data. The third section presents the results of Part D’s effect on prescription drug coverage and expenditures and offers a tentative assessment of the program’s overall social impact. The final section concludes that Part D has resulted in substantial crowd out of both coverage and expenditures and, as of 2007, has produced only modest benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Gary V. Engelhardt & Jonathan Gruber, 2011. "Does Medicare Part D Protect the Elderly from Financial Risk?," Issues in Brief ib2011-8, Center for Retirement Research, revised Jun 2011.
  • Handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2011-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://crr.bc.edu/briefs/does-medicare-part-d-protect-the-elderly-from-financial-risk/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barnes, Kayleigh & Mukherji, Arnab & Mullen, Patrick & Sood, Neeraj, 2017. "Financial risk protection from social health insurance," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 14-29.
    2. Sanzenbacher, Geoffrey T. & Wettstein, Gal, 2020. "Drug insurance and the strategic behavior of drug manufacturers: Evergreening and generic entry after Medicare Part D," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    3. Samuel Dodini, 2023. "Insurance Subsidies, the Affordable Care Act, and Financial Stability," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(1), pages 97-136, January.
    4. Pinka Chatterji & Chun-Yu Ho & Tao Jin & Yichuan Wang, 2024. "Does Consolidation in Insurer Markets affect Insurance Enrollment and Drug Expenditures? Evidence from Medicare Part D," NBER Working Papers 32267, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Pak, Tae-Young, 2021. "What are the effects of expanding social pension on health? Evidence from the Basic Pension in South Korea," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 18(C).
    6. Argys, Laura M. & Friedson, Andrew I. & Pitts, M. Melinda & Tello-Trillo, D. Sebastian, 2020. "Losing public health insurance: TennCare reform and personal financial distress," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    7. Cortnie Shupe, 2023. "Public Health Insurance and Medical Spending: The Incidence of the ACA Medicaid Expansion," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(1), pages 137-165, January.
    8. Mudit Kapoor & Shamika Ravi, 2017. "Elasticity of Intertemporal Substitution in Consumption in the Presence of Inertia: Empirical Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(12), pages 4188-4200, December.
    9. Padmaja Ayyagari & Dan M. Shane & George L. Wehby, 2017. "The Impact of Medicare Part D on Emergency Department Visits," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 536-544, April.
    10. Michael Batty & Christa Gibbs & Benedic Ippolito, 2022. "Health insurance, medical debt, and financial well‐being," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 689-728, May.
    11. Joelle Abramowitz & Brett O'Hara & Darcy Steeg Morris, 2017. "Risking Life and Limb: Estimating a Measure of Medical Care Economic Risk and Considering its Implications," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 469-485, April.
    12. Singh, Nirvikar, 2018. "Financial Inclusion: Concepts, Issues and Policies for India," Santa Cruz Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt98p5m37s, Department of Economics, UC Santa Cruz.
    13. Abraham Abebe Asfaw, 2019. "The effect of prescription drug insurance on health behavior: Evidence from Medicare Part D," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 403-418, March.
    14. Qin Zhou & Karen Eggleston & Gordon G. Liu, 2021. "Healthcare utilization at retirement in China," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(11), pages 2618-2636, November.
    15. Feiyan Yang & Li Wei, 2023. "The impact of tax-subsidized health insurance on health and out-of-pocket burden in China," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 48(1), pages 194-246, January.
    16. David Dranove & Craig Garthwaite & Manuel Hermosilla, 2022. "Does consumer demand pull scientifically novel drug innovation?," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 53(3), pages 590-638, September.
    17. repec:aei:rpaper:1008569439 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2011-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.