IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/issbrf/ib2008-8-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How Much Do Older Workers Value Employee Health Insurance?

Author

Listed:
  • Leora Friedberg
  • Wei Sun
  • Anthony Webb

Abstract

This brief seeks to answer the question in the title by analyzing data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a nationally representative survey of older Americans. New questions in the HRS enable researchers to compare the value that workers place on health insurance with their perceptions about the cost of coverage. The comparison of cost with willingness-to-pay is important for two reasons. First, it helps us understand why some workers and their families do not have health insurance. In one sense, the reason is straightforward. The overwhelming majority — 85 percent — of uninsured workers of all ages are either ineligible for coverage that their employer provides or else work for an employer that does not offer coverage. This absence of employer-provided coverage leaves them to seek health insurance on the individual market, where both prices and denial rates are high...

Suggested Citation

  • Leora Friedberg & Wei Sun & Anthony Webb, 2008. "How Much Do Older Workers Value Employee Health Insurance?," Issues in Brief ib2008-8-9, Center for Retirement Research, revised Jul 2008.
  • Handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2008-8-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://bit.ly/LRN706
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2008-8-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.