Author
Abstract
This study investigates the statistical connection between the parameters of the Canadian unemployment insurance system and the rate of social assistance in the Province of Quebec. It is based on an econometric analysis of the annual macroeconomic data of the last two decades and simulations generated from this analysis. The main conclusion is that the major amendments brought to the benefit system by the UI/EI Acts of 1990, 1994 and 1996 will increase the number of welfare recipients in Quebec cumulatively by about 194,000 (based on constant 1997 population), and will raise the overall cost of Quebec social assistance by about $845 million per year (in constant 1997 dollars). By itself, the 1996 EI Act will eventually increase the number of welfare recipients by about 36,000, and cost an additional $157 million to the Quebec Treasury. These impacts will be distributed over the next decade, but 90 % will occur over the next five years. The estimates reported include not only the static impacts of UI/EI amendments with unchanged worker behaviour, which studies based on administrative data can usually capture, but also their dynamic impacts on worker behaviour, and most notably their strong propensity to drop out of the labour force, which administrative data are not suited to deal with. La présente étude effectue une analyse statistique du lien entre les paramètres du régime canadien d'assurance-chômage et le taux d'assistance sociale au Québec. Les résultats de cette analyse statistique fondée sur les données macroéconomiques annuelles des deux dernières décennies, de même que les simulations qui en sont tirées, indiquent que les trois modifications majeures apportées à l'assurance-chômage par les lois de 1990, 1994 et 1996 auront entraîné à terme une augmentation cumulative d'environ 194 000 personnes à l'aide sociale québécoise (à population constante de 1997) et un gonflement concomitant du coût de la sécurité du revenu d'environ 845 M$ (en dollars constants de 1997). À elle seule, la Loi de l'assurance-emploi de 1996 amènera ultimement environ 36 000 personnes de plus à la sécurité du revenu et coûtera environ 157 M$ au trésor québécois. Ces effets s'échelonneront sur une décennie complète, mais 90 % se réaliseront au cours des cinq prochaines années. Les estimations incorporent non seulement les effets statiques des modifications à l'assurance-chômage (à comportement constant des travailleurs) que peuvent capter les études basées sur les données administratives, mais également leurs effets dynamiques sur le comportement des travailleurs, et tout particulièrement leur décrochage massif du marché du travail, qui est observable depuis 1990.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cre:crefec:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stéphane Pallage (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crefeca.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.