IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crc/wpaper/2005.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Long Way to Universal Health Coverage (UHC): Are Policy Dialogue Processes Appropriate to Negotiate Trade-Offs in Africa? The Cases of Benin and Senegal

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabeth PAUL

    (POLISSI, School of Public Health, Université libre de Bruxelles (Belgium) / Tax Institute, Université de Liège, (Belgium))

  • Fabienne FECHER

    (Institut de Recherche en Sciences Sociales (IRSS), Faculty of Social Sciences, Université de Liège, (Belgium))

  • Céline DEVILLE

    (Institut de Recherche en Sciences Sociales (IRSS), Faculty of Social Sciences, Université de Liège, (Belgium))

  • Youssoupha NDIAYE

    (Directorate of Planning, Research and Statistics, Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, Dakar, (Senegal))

  • Farba Lamine SALL

    (Senegal Country Office, World Health Organization, Dakar, (Senegal))

  • N’koué EmmanuelSAMBIÉNI

    (Faculté des Lettres, Arts et Sciences humaines, Université de Parakou, (Benin))

  • Remo MELONI

    (ndependent public health consultant, Kigali, (Rwanda))

  • Denis PORIGNON

    (Department of Public Health, Université de Liège, (Belgium))

Abstract

The numerous stakeholders involved in the development of universal health coverage (UHC) policies are likely to have diverging interests about which dimensions to prioritize, hence the importance of ensuring an effective and transparent policy dialogue. This paper aims to investigate whether or not UHC policy dialogue processes are functioning well in Benin and Senegal. Based on a literature review, we have identified a number of characteristics guaranteeing the quality of policy dialogue processes, which we have integrated into an analytical grid. The quality criteria identified were classified along four dimensions: stakeholder participation, dialogue/negotiation process, quality of situation analysis and decision criteria, and results from the negotiation process. Based on data collected through documentary review, interviews, an electronic survey and the authors’ own experience, we applied that analytical grid to the cases of Benin and Senegal. In both countries, the policy dialogue processes are largely imperfect in terms of many of the quality criteria identified. Decisions were made under strong political leadership, ensuring government coordination and ownership, and strong emphasis has been put on expanding financial risk protection. Yet, both countries perform poorly in a number of dimensions, especially with regards to conflicts of interest, transparency and accountability. None of them has really institutionalized a UHC policy dialogue process, and the UHC policymaking processes have actually bypassed existing health sector coordination mechanisms. The two countries perform well regarding the quality of situation analysis. A small (in the case of Benin) or broader (in the case of Senegal) governmental coalition managed to impose its views, given insufficient stakeholder participation. Policy networks were particularly influential in Senegal. Overall, there are important gaps that reduce the quality of UHC policy dialogue processes, hence explaining the weaknesses in their results in terms of transparency and accountability. Our analytical framework enables usto identify rooms for improvement with regard to country-led negotiation processes relating to UHC.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabeth PAUL & Fabienne FECHER & Céline DEVILLE & Youssoupha NDIAYE & Farba Lamine SALL & N’koué EmmanuelSAMBIÉNI & Remo MELONI & Denis PORIGNON, 2020. "Long Way to Universal Health Coverage (UHC): Are Policy Dialogue Processes Appropriate to Negotiate Trade-Offs in Africa? The Cases of Benin and Senegal," CIRIEC Working Papers 2005, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
  • Handle: RePEc:crc:wpaper:2005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ciriec.uliege.be/repec/WP20-05.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Cotlear & Somil Nagpal & Owen Smith & Ajay Tandon & Rafael Cortez, 2015. "Going Universal," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 22011.
    2. Beth Woods & Paul Revill & Mark Sculpher & Karl Claxton, 2015. "Country-level cost-effectiveness thresholds: initial estimates and the need for further research," Working Papers 109cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew J. Mirelman & Miqdad Asaria & Bryony Dawkins & Susan Griffin & Richard Cookson & Peter Berman, 2020. "Fairer Decisions, Better Health for All: Health Equity and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Paul Revill & Marc Suhrcke & Rodrigo Moreno-Serra & Mark Sculpher (ed.), Global Health Economics Shaping Health Policy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries, chapter 4, pages 99-132, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Paul Revill & Simon Walker & Valentina Cambiano & Andrew Phillips & Mark J Sculpher, 2018. "Reflecting the real value of health care resources in modelling and cost-effectiveness studies—The example of viral load informed differentiated care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Aidan Hollis, 2016. "Sustainable Financing of Innovative Therapies: A Review of Approaches," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 34(10), pages 971-980, October.
    4. Elisabeth Paul & Céline Deville & Oriane Bodson & N'koué Emmanuel Sambiéni & Ibrahima Thiam & Marc Bourgeois & Valéry Ridde & Fabienne Fecher, 2019. "How is equity approached in universal health coverage? An analysis of global and country policy documents in Benin and Senegal," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/298047, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    5. Byrne, Dominic & Kwak, Do Won & Tang, Kam Ki & Yazbeck, Myra, 2023. "Spillover effects of retirement: Does health vulnerability matter?," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    6. Jessica Ochalek & Karl Claxton & Paul Revill & Mark Sculpher & Alexandra Rollinger, 2016. "Supporting the development of an essential health package: principles and initial assessment for Malawi," Working Papers 136cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    7. Sven Neelsen & Owen O'Donnell, 2017. "Progressive universalism? The impact of targeted coverage on health care access and expenditures in Peru," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(12), pages 179-203, December.
    8. Diego Proaño Falconi & Eduardo Bernabé, 2018. "Determinants of catastrophic healthcare expenditure in Peru," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 425-436, December.
    9. Robert Kolesar & Sambo Pheakdey & Bart Jacobs & Narith Chan & Samedy Yok & Martine Audibert, 2019. "Expanding Social Health Protection in Cambodia: An assessment of the current coverage potential and gaps, and social equity considerations," Working Papers halshs-02018867, HAL.
    10. Jan-Walter De Neve & Rija L Andriantavison & Kevin Croke & Johannes Krisam & Voahirana H Rajoela & Rary A Rakotoarivony & Valérie Rambeloson & Linda Schultz & Jumana Qamruddin & Stéphane Verguet, 2018. "Health, financial, and education gains of investing in preventive chemotherapy for schistosomiasis, soil-transmitted helminthiases, and lymphatic filariasis in Madagascar: A modeling study," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Jessica Ochalek & Haiyin Wang & Yuanyuan Gu & James Lomas & Henry Cutler & Chunlin Jin, 2020. "Informing a Cost-Effectiveness Threshold for Health Technology Assessment in China: A Marginal Productivity Approach," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 38(12), pages 1319-1331, December.
    12. Morton, Alec & Arulselvan, Ashwin & Thomas, Ranjeeta, 2018. "Allocation rules for global donors," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101210, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Sameera Awawda & Mohammad Abu-Zaineh, 2019. "An Operationalizing Theoretical Framework for the Analysis of Universal Health Coverage Reforms: First Test on an Archetype Developing Economy," Working Papers halshs-02009858, HAL.
    14. James Love-Koh & Susan Griffin & Edward Kataika & Paul Revill & Sibusiso Sibandze & Simon Walker & Jessica Ochalek & Mark Sculpher & Matthias Arnold, 2019. "Economic analysis for health benefits package design," Working Papers 165cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    15. Anuj Tiwari & David J Blok & Mohammad Arif & Jan Hendrik Richardus, 2020. "Leprosy post-exposure prophylaxis in the Indian health system: A cost-effectiveness analysis," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-12, August.
    16. Morton, Alec & Arulselvan, Ashwin & Thomas, Ranjeeta, 2018. "Allocation rules for global donors," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 67-75.
    17. Culyer, Anthony J., 2016. "Cost-effectiveness thresholds in health care: a bookshelf guide to their meaning and use," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(4), pages 415-432, October.
    18. Laia Cirera & Beatriz Galatas & Sergi Alonso & Krijn Paaijmans & Miler Mamuquele & Helena Martí-Soler & Caterina Guinovart & Humberto Munguambe & Fabião Luis & Hoticha Nhantumbo & Júlia Montañà & Quiq, 2020. "Moving towards malaria elimination in southern Mozambique: Cost and cost-effectiveness of mass drug administration combined with intensified malaria control," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Amani Mori & Ole Norheim & Bjarne Robberstad, 2016. "Budget Impact Analysis of Using Dihydroartemisinin–Piperaquine to Treat Uncomplicated Malaria in Children in Tanzania," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 303-314, March.
    20. Sonia Bhalotra & Rudi Rocha & Rodrigo R. Soares, 2019. "Does Universalization of Health Work? Evidence from Health Systems Restructuring and Expansion in Brazil," Documentos de Trabajo 17122, The Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association (LACEA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Universal Health Coverage; Policy Dialogue; Deliberative Processes; Benin; Senegal; Western Africa;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
    • H51 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Health
    • H53 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crc:wpaper:2005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CIRIEC (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciulgbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.