IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprfm/0005.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Uncertainty, Collusion and Returns in a Multiple-Bid, Multiple-Unit Auction with Resale

Author

Listed:
  • Steven R Umlauf

Abstract

This paper analyses bidding behaviour in the Mexican Treasury debt auction for the period 1986-9. Auction rules closely resemble those of the US Treasury auction: bidders submit multiple bids for multiple units. The majority of purchased quantities are immediately resold. Results suggest collusion among the six largest bidders, who on average purchase 75% of new government debt issues. Results also suggest information asymmetries between these six bidders and remaining participants. The majority of bidders account for the winner's curse. Measures of resale risk and ex ante information disparities among bidders explain cross- sectional variation in downward biases of winning bids as estimates of resale values. Cross-sectional analysis also suggests a positive correlation between the magnitudes of pre- specified maxima of non-competitive bids and auction revenues.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven R Umlauf, 1990. "Uncertainty, Collusion and Returns in a Multiple-Bid, Multiple-Unit Auction with Resale," CEPR Financial Markets Paper 0005, European Science Foundation Network in Financial Markets, c/o C.E.P.R, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX..
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprfm:0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Public Debt; Auctions; Mexico;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprfm:0005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.