IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/499.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Fallacy of Composition Argument: Does Demand Matter for LDC Manufactured Exports?

Author

Listed:
  • Faini, Riccardo

Abstract

The constraints imposed upon the growth of LDC exports by international demand have been the subject of a long-standing controversy. In this paper we present estimates of manufactures export-demand functions for 23 LDCs. We focus first on the constraints that the international environment imposes upon export growth for an individual LDC. We assess the claim that supply factors play a dominant role in affecting export performances by testing the `small-country hypothesis' of an infinitely elastic demand. We turn next to the constraints on global export growth and ask whether exports from LDCs compete mostly with Northern products, or are instead substitutes for exports from other LDCs. This allows us to assess the empirical validity of Cline's 1982 claim that a generalized outward shift in the LDCs' export-supply schedule would be associated with a significant decline in prices and would undermine the success of a widespread export-led strategy. We find that for a representative LDC a large share almost 80% of the benefits of devaluation on export revenues vanish when other LDC competitors pursue similar policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Faini, Riccardo, 1990. "The Fallacy of Composition Argument: Does Demand Matter for LDC Manufactured Exports?," CEPR Discussion Papers 499, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=499
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:wsr:wpaper:y:2012:i:102 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. I. Goldin & D. Evans, 1991. "Trade Reform and Structural Adjustment," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 59(3), pages 141-151, September.
    3. Rudiger Dornbusch, 1992. "The Case for Trade Liberalization in Developing Countries," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(1), pages 69-85, Winter.
    4. Giorgia Giovannetti & Marco Sanfilippo, 2016. "China’s competition and the export price strategies of developed countries," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 238-254, March.
    5. Olivier Cortès & Sébastien Jean, 1996. "Pays émergents, emploi déficient ?," Working Papers 1996-05, CEPII research center.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.