IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/243.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Brazilian Debt: A Requiem for Muddling Through

Author

Listed:
  • Cardoso, Eliana
  • Dornbusch, Rudiger

Abstract

This paper investigates the roles played by the global macroeconomic environment and by Brazilian policy in shaping the Brazilian debt crisis, and assesses the prospects for Brazil's sovereign debt after five years of the `muddling-through' strategy. We first examine Brazilian debt from a historical perspective and then consider the experiences of the 1970s. Between 1978 and 1982, Brazil's current account shifted by $13 billion towards deficits. This shift can be explained, for the most part, by the slowdown in exports, increased real interest rates and high real oil prices. Our estimates suggest that between 1978 and 1982, $35 billion (75% of Brazil's total net debt accumulation) can be accounted for by the adverse external environment. We then review the period 1982-7 and highlight four factors which contributed to the failure of the muddling-through strategy: higher than expected real interest rates, the failure of commodity prices to rise from their low 1982 levels, the unexpected difficulties due to the transfer problem, and the diminishing enthusiasm of creditors for the strategy. We conclude by discussing policies which, we argue, would better serve the long-term interests of Brazil and its creditors.

Suggested Citation

  • Cardoso, Eliana & Dornbusch, Rudiger, 1988. "Brazilian Debt: A Requiem for Muddling Through," CEPR Discussion Papers 243, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=243
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.