IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/19344.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact of Secondary School Subsidies on Career Trajectories in a Dual Labor Market: Experimental Evidence from Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Duflo, Esther
  • Dupas, Pascaline
  • Kremer, Michael

Abstract

In 2008, we randomly assigned secondary school scholarships among 2,064 youths in Ghana. This paper exploits fifteen years of follow-up data to examine the impact of access to free secondary education on career trajectories over the first part of the life cycle. Winning a scholarship increases the probability of secondary school graduation from 45% (in the control group) to 73% (in the treatment group), and leads to an increase in knowledge and skills. However, the entry of secondary school graduates (with or without scholarship) in the labor market is very gradual, as many attempt, over many years, to qualify for tertiary programs that are gateways for government jobs. By 2023, 12% of females and 15% of males in the control group have completed a tertiary program. The scholarship increases this share by 11 percentage points for females, but not at all for males. We do not observe significant labor market impacts for men at any point. In contrast, earnings gains of around 24% arise in 2020 and grow to 30% in 2023 for female scholarship recipients, who are 6.7 percentage points (100%) more likely than non-recipients to have a government job by then. We use a simple Harris-Todaro style model of a dual labor market with credit constraints to (a) explain the gendered impacts and (b) discuss the impact that generalized free secondary education would be expected to have in general equilibrium, under different regimes of hiring in the government sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Duflo, Esther & Dupas, Pascaline & Kremer, Michael, 2024. "The Impact of Secondary School Subsidies on Career Trajectories in a Dual Labor Market: Experimental Evidence from Ghana," CEPR Discussion Papers 19344, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP19344
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.