IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/19256.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Governments' Home Bias and Efficiency Losses: Evidence from National and Subnational Governments

Author

Listed:
  • García-Santana, Manuel
  • Santamaria, Marta

Abstract

We use one million procurement contracts awarded in France and Spain to quantify the importance of home bias in explaining governments’ purchases. We propose two strategies that allow us to filter out other factors that may explain the high geographical concentration in government procurement. We use the fact that “home†may have a different meaning for subnational and national governments. We identify their relative bias by comparing how much of the same product local and non-local establishments sell to national and subnational agencies in the same location. We also exploit a quasi-natural experiment that reduced the number of French regions. We compare how much establishments sell in their “new local†regions before and after the change. We use a trade model to quantify what our reduced-form estimates imply and find that governments’ home bias increases local expenditures shares by up to 29% and reduces governments’ output by up to 8%.

Suggested Citation

  • García-Santana, Manuel & Santamaria, Marta, 2024. "Governments' Home Bias and Efficiency Losses: Evidence from National and Subnational Governments," CEPR Discussion Papers 19256, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP19256
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.