IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/19225.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Empowerment or Financialization? The Gains from Financial Inclusion

Author

Listed:
  • Besley, Tim
  • Burchardi, Konrad
  • Ghatak, Maitreesh
  • Xu, Linchuan

Abstract

Expanding access to credit markets can be seen as a source of empowerment when it increases economic opportunities and changes who is able to start a new business. It can also have equilibrium effects on wages so that the gains from financial development are widely shared. But others see credit market expansion as an unwelcome process of `financialization' with many of the gains being appropriated by financial institutions, pointing to the concentration in ownership of financial intermediaries, especially banks, around the world. This paper explores these issues, investigating the consequences of financial sector expansion for profits, wages and entrepreneurial activity using a calibrated general equilibrium model with financial frictions, endogenous default, and wealth inequality. A key element of the model is to examine how the surplus created in the real economy by expanding financial markets is shared between borrowers, lenders, and workers employed by firms. We show that competition in banking can be an important determinant of both equity and efficiency, and hence the gains from financial inclusion. The framework also highlights the role that different types of contractual imperfections can play in determining the distribution of gains from expanding market access.

Suggested Citation

  • Besley, Tim & Burchardi, Konrad & Ghatak, Maitreesh & Xu, Linchuan, 2024. "Empowerment or Financialization? The Gains from Financial Inclusion," CEPR Discussion Papers 19225, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP19225
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.