IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/18917.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Not Playing Favorites: Parents and the Value of Equal Opportunity

Author

Listed:
  • Berry, Jim
  • Dizon-Ross, Rebecca
  • ,

Abstract

We conduct a pair of experiments to identify the value that parents place on equality of opportunity when investing in their children. The first is a real-stakes, lab-in-the-field experiment in a lower-income country and the second a hypothetical, online survey experiment in multiple higher-income countries. The experiments exogenously vary the short-run returns to educational investments to identify how much parents care about equalizing "opportunity" (the investment in each child) relative to maximizing "returns" (total household earnings) or to equalizing "outcomes" (child-level expected earnings). We show that while parents in both experiments place some weight on maximizing returns, they also display a strong preference for equalizing opportunities and are willing to forgo roughly 15-45% of their potential earnings to do so. We find that parents in the higher-income countries also care about equalizing outcomes, while parents in the lower-income country do not.

Suggested Citation

  • Berry, Jim & Dizon-Ross, Rebecca & ,, 2024. "Not Playing Favorites: Parents and the Value of Equal Opportunity," CEPR Discussion Papers 18917, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:18917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP18917
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:18917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.