IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/18715.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Precolonial Elites and Colonial Redistribution of Political Power

Author

Listed:
  • Hartnett, Allison
  • Saleh, Mohamed

Abstract

Studies of colonialism often associate indirect colonial rule with continuity of the precolonial political order. These studies are largely silent, however, regarding how colonialism affected the distribution of power among precolonial domestic elites. We argue that colonial authorities, seeking to maximize economic extraction, will redistribute power toward less oppositional elites. We test our theory on the colonial occupation of Egypt in 1882, where British authorities encountered a domestic elite divided between the landed elite and the rural middle class. Using an original dataset on members of the Egyptian parliament and a difference-in-differences empirical strategy, we show that the colonial authorities shifted parliamentary representation toward the (congruent) landed elite and away from the (oppositional) rural middle class. This shift was greater in export-oriented regions, where the precolonial rural middle class was more powerful. Our results suggest that indirect rule entails previously unmeasured ruptures in the social-structural fabric of colonized societies.

Suggested Citation

  • Hartnett, Allison & Saleh, Mohamed, 2023. "Precolonial Elites and Colonial Redistribution of Political Power," CEPR Discussion Papers 18715, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:18715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP18715
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Middle east;

    JEL classification:

    • F54 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - Colonialism; Imperialism; Postcolonialism
    • N35 - Economic History - - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy - - - Asia including Middle East

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:18715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.