IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/18520.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Race, Glass Ceilings, and Lower Pay for Equal Work

Author

Listed:
  • Hegde, Deepak
  • Ljungqvist, Alexander
  • Raj, Manav

Abstract

Using detailed administrative data that allow us to observe who is eligible for promotion when, we document that Black patent examiners at the U.S. patent office face substantial glass ceilings: Black examiners who are definitely promotion-eligible are 30% less likely to be timely promoted to the top grade than equally qualified White examiners and take 13% longer to reach the top of the career ladder, while working harder and earning less along the way. Promotion gaps disappear when supervisors face higher costs of not timely promoting Black examiners. Black supervisors who were promoted slowly themselves tend to promote Black examiners particularly slowly. Promotion gaps hurt examiner productivity and contribute to the growing backlog of unexamined patent applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Hegde, Deepak & Ljungqvist, Alexander & Raj, Manav, 2023. "Race, Glass Ceilings, and Lower Pay for Equal Work," CEPR Discussion Papers 18520, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:18520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP18520
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:18520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.