IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/10853.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

EC ? Seal Products: The Tension between Public Morals and International Trade Agreements

Author

Listed:
  • Conconi, Paola
  • Voon, Tania

Abstract

The dispute in EC ? Seal Products raises fundamental questions about the relationship between public morals and international trade. Can WTO members impose trade restrictions based on moral or ethical concerns? Under what conditions can these concerns trump existing trade liberalization commitments? The dispute was filed in 2009 by Canada and Norway against the EU, which in the same year had banned seal products from being imported and placed on its market. According to the EU, the policy was introduced in response to European moral outrage at the inhumane killing of seals. The EU seal regime included a series of exceptions. In particular, it allowed imports of seal products hunted by Inuit or other indigenous communities, as well as imports of seal products processed and re-exported by EU producers. This article discusses the Appellate Body?s ruling in EC ? Seal Products and some of the key legal and economic issues raised by this dispute.

Suggested Citation

  • Conconi, Paola & Voon, Tania, 2015. "EC ? Seal Products: The Tension between Public Morals and International Trade Agreements," CEPR Discussion Papers 10853, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:10853
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP10853
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tania Voon & Andrew Mitchell & Catherine Gascoigne, 2013. "Consumer information, consumer preferences and product labels under the TBT Agreement," Chapters, in: Tracey Epps & Michael J. Trebilcock (ed.), Research Handbook on the WTO and Technical Barriers to Trade, chapter 13, pages 454-484, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Lothar Ehring, 2008. "Public Access to Dispute Settlement Hearings in the World Trade Organization," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(4), pages 1021-1034, December.
    3. Levy, Philip I. & Regan, Donald H., 2015. "EC–Seal Products: Seals and Sensibilities (TBT Aspects of the Panel and Appellate Body Reports)," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(2), pages 337-379, April.
    4. Crowley, Meredith A. & Howse, Robert, 2014. "Tuna–Dolphin II: a legal and economic analysis of the Appellate Body Report," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(2), pages 321-355, April.
    5. Alan Yanovich & Tania Voon, 2006. "Completing the Analysis in WTO Appeals: The Practice and its Limitations," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 9(4), pages 933-950, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bown, Chad & Crowley, Meredith A., 2016. "The Empirical Landscape of Trade Policy," CEPR Discussion Papers 11216, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bown,Chad P. & Crowley,Meredith A & Bown,Chad P. & Crowley,Meredith A, 2016. "The empirical landscape of trade policy," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7620, The World Bank.
    2. Bown, Chad P. & Brewster, Rachel, 2017. "US–COOL Retaliation: The WTO's Article 22.6 Arbitration," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 371-394, April.
    3. Sonntag, Winnie & Spiller, Achim, 2016. "Prozessqualitäten in der WTO: Ein Vorschlag für die reliable Messung von moralischen Bedenken," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 260775, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    4. Manfred Elsig, 2010. "The World Trade Organization at work: Performance in a member-driven milieu," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 345-363, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Moral concerns; Protection; Trade disputes;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:10853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.