IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cor/louvrp/1552.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Public versus private insurance with dual theory: a political economy argument

Author

Listed:
  • HINDRIKS, Jean

Abstract

This paper analyzes the political support for public insurance in the presence of a private insurance alternative. The public insurance is compulsory and offers a uniform insurance policy. The private insurance is voluntary and can offer different insurance policies. Adopting Yaari's [Econometrica, 55, 95–115, 1987] dual theory to expected utility (i.e., risk aversion without diminishing marginal utility of income), we show that adverse selection on the private insurance market may lead a majority of individuals to prefer public insurance over private insurance, even if the median risk is below the average risk (so that the median actually subsidizes high-risk individuals). We also show that risk aversion makes public insurance more attractive and that the dual theory is less favourable to a mixed insurance system than the expected utility framework. Lastly, we demonstrate how the use of genetic tests may threaten the political viability of public insurance. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory (2001) 26, 225–241. doi:10.1023/A:1015289903491
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • HINDRIKS, Jean, 2001. "Public versus private insurance with dual theory: a political economy argument," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1552, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    • Handle: RePEc:cor:louvrp:1552
    Note: In : The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 26, 225-241, 2001.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kazuhiko Sakai & Mahito Okura, 2012. "An Economic Analysis of Compulsory and Voluntary Insurance," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 2(2), pages 1-8, April.
    2. Rossignol, Stéphane, 2008. "Politics of social health insurance," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 387-401, June.
    3. Okura Mahito & Sakaki Motohiro & Yoshizawa Takuya, 2021. "Should Liability Insurance Be Compulsory for Bicycle Accidents?," Asian Journal of Law and Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 19-35, April.
    4. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:4:y:2008:i:18:p:1-8 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Peilu Zhang & Marco A. Palma, 2021. "Compulsory Versus Voluntary Insurance: An Online Experiment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(1), pages 106-125, January.
    6. Tim Friehe, 2008. "Insurance, Pooling, and Resistance to Reform: The Case of Individual Uncertainty," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(18), pages 1-8.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cor:louvrp:1552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alain GILLIS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/coreebe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.