IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000123/002756.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gasto público en protección social en Colombia: análisis y propuestas

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Perotti

Abstract

Introducción. Tradicionalmente, los gastos en salud y educación han jugado un papel principal tanto en las discusiones teóricas como en la asignación del gasto social en Colombia. Esto refleja un punto de vista compartido por muchos en el sentido que la política social debe orientarse a erradicar las causas de la pobreza en vez de sus manifestaciones. En este trabajo se argumenta que este punto de vista tiene muy poco contenido teórico y, de manera más importante, puede ser responsable por una actitud que menosprecia todos aquellos programas sociales enfocados a los pobres que no contribuyen, de una u otra forma, a construir capital humano. En cambio, se argumenta que estos programas deberían tener ciudadanía total en un país del nivel de desarrollo como Colombia. Sin embargo, hasta al interior de los gastos sociales diferentes a salud y educación se nota que la asignación actual está muy sesgada hacia programas que no benefician a los pobres o que a menudo lo hacen tan sólo de manera marginal. En particular, las pensiones tienen una participación excesiva en el gasto social y se pagan, casi exclusivamente, a los últimos dos quintiles de la distribución. Esto deja muy poco espacio para otros programas, principalmente aquellos dirigidos a los ninos y sus familias y a programas relacionados con el mercado laboral. Estos programas, a su vez, sufren de problemas propios, particularmente de una casi completa falta de evaluaciones útiles, una excesiva fragmentación en muchos organismos y subprogramas y una falta de claridad en sus objetivos, lo cual es una consecuencia casi inevitable. La estructura de este trabajo es la siguiente. Considerando la ausencia de un marco teórico comprehensivo que sirva para analizar el gasto social, la Sección 2 discute las características más importantes a considerar al evaluar el gasto social colombiano. La Sección 3 ubica al gasto social en el contexto más amplio de la política fiscal, discutiendo la evolución de la pobreza en los anos noventa y los instrumentos disponibles para focalizar el gasto social. La Sección 4 discute extensamente los principales programas sociales en las áreas de pensiones, familias y ninos y empleo y desempleo. La Sección 5 contiene las conclusiones del estudio.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Perotti, 2000. "Gasto público en protección social en Colombia: análisis y propuestas," Working Papers Series. Documentos de Trabajo 2756, Fedesarrollo.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000123:002756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11445/821
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oded Galor & Joseph Zeira, 1993. "Income Distribution and Macroeconomics," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 60(1), pages 35-52.
    2. Ravallion, Martin, 1998. "Appraising workfare programs," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1955, The World Bank.
    3. Ruthanne Deutsch, 1998. "How Early Childhood Interventions Can Reduce Inequality: An Overview of Recent Findings," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 50998, Inter-American Development Bank.
    4. Stefano Farné & Oskar Andrés Nupia, 1996. "Reforma laboral, empleo e ingresos de los trabajadores temporales en Colombia," Coyuntura Social 13209, Fedesarrollo.
    5. Michael Gavin & Roberto Perotti, 1997. "Fiscal Policy in Latin America," NBER Chapters, in: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1997, Volume 12, pages 11-72, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Orazio P. Attanasio & Miguel Székely, 1999. "An Asset-Based Approach to the Analysis of Poverty in Latin America," Research Department Publications 3075, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    7. James, Estelle, 1999. "Coverage under old-agesecurity programs and protection for the uninsured - What are the issues?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2163, The World Bank.
    8. Darwin Cortés & Luis F. Gamboa & Jorge I. González, 1999. "ICV: hacia una medida de estándar de vida," Coyuntura Social 13028, Fedesarrollo.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberto Perotti, 2000. "Public spending on social protection in Colombia : analysis and proposals," Working Papers Series. Documentos de Trabajo 3407, Fedesarrollo.
    2. Woo, Jaejoon, 2003. "Social polarization, industrialization, and fiscal instability: theory and evidence," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 223-252, October.
    3. World Bank, 2002. "Colombia : Social Safety Net Assessment," World Bank Publications - Reports 15361, The World Bank Group.
    4. Quah, Danny, 1994. "One business cycle and one trend from (many,) many disaggregates," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 605-614, April.
    5. Kawalec Paweł, 2020. "The dynamics of theories of economic growth: An impact of Unified Growth Theory," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 6(2), pages 19-44, June.
    6. Graziella Bertocchi, 2011. "The Vanishing Bequest Tax: The Comparative Evolution Of Bequest Taxation In Historical Perspective," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 107-131, March.
    7. Grossmann, Volker, 2008. "Risky human capital investment, income distribution, and macroeconomic dynamics," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 19-42, March.
    8. Pierre‐Richard Agénor, 2004. "Macroeconomic Adjustment and the Poor: Analytical Issues and Cross‐Country Evidence," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 351-408, July.
    9. Azariadis, Costas & Stachurski, John, 2005. "Poverty Traps," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 5, Elsevier.
    10. Perugini, Cristiano, 2020. "Patterns and drivers of household income dynamics in Russia: The role of access to credit," BOFIT Discussion Papers 11/2020, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    11. Canavire-Bacarreza, Gustavo & Martínez-Vázquez, Jorge & Vulovic, Violeta, 2013. "Taxation and Economic Growth in Latin America," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 4583, Inter-American Development Bank.
    12. Boukraine, Wissem, 2020. "The finance-inequality nexus in the BRICS countries: evidence from an ARDL bound testing approach," MPRA Paper 101976, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Markus Brueckner & Daniel Lederman, 2018. "Inequality and economic growth: the role of initial income," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 341-366, September.
    14. Vos, Rob & Frenkel, Roberto & Ocampo, José Antonio & Palma, José Gabriel & Marfán, Manuel & Ros, Jaime & Taylor, Lance & Correa, Nelson & Cimoli, Mario, 2005. "Beyond Reforms: Structural Dynamics and Macroeconomic Vulnerability," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 347, November.
    15. Carine Nourry, 2012. "Dasgupta, D.: Modern growth theory," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 105(1), pages 97-100, January.
    16. Michael King, 2012. "The Unbanked Four-Fifths: Informality and Barriers to Financial Services in Nigeria," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp411, IIIS.
    17. Asongu, Simplice A. & Odhiambo, Nicholas M., 2021. "Inequality, finance and renewable energy consumption in Sub-Saharan Africa," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 678-688.
    18. Torsten Persson & Guido Tabellini, "undated". "Political Institutions and Policy Outcomes: What are the Stylized Facts?," Working Papers 189, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    19. Neelam Timsina, 2016. "Determinants of Bank Lending in Nepal," NRB Economic Review, Nepal Rastra Bank, Economic Research Department, vol. 28(2), pages 19-42, October.
    20. Arief Anshory Yusuf, 2005. "A Survey on Growth and Inequality: Does Improved Inequality Data Have Anything to Say?," Working Papers in Economics and Development Studies (WoPEDS) 200501, Department of Economics, Padjadjaran University, revised Oct 2005.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Gastos Públicos;

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • I20 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - General
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
    • H53 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000123:002756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Patricia Monroy (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedesco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.