IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000111/016169.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Actualidad y perspectivas del sistema pensional colombiano

Author

Listed:
  • Grupo de Economía de la Salud
  • Jairo Humberto Restrepo

Abstract

La seguridad social enfrenta enormes retos en todos los países. En lo que respecta a los riesgos asociados a la vejez, a la discapacidad y a la muerte, que suelen ser cubiertos mediante esquemas de pensiones para garantizar que el bienestar de las personas y de sus familias no se vea afectado por falta de ingresos, el mundo se enfrenta a fenómenos o procesos como el cambio demográfico, los avances en materia de derechos y las restricciones de presupuesto. Es así como a lo largo del tiempo los países cuentan con una mayor proporción de población adulta, con una esperanza de vida más alta y con unas necesidades de atención que demandan más recursos. Colombia se encuentra en este tránsito, con un crecimiento importante de la población pensionada, pero, al mismo tiempo, con una serie de interrogantes sobre las perspectivas del sistema pensional en cuanto a las garantías que puede brindar en materia de cobertura y al equilibrio financiero. Preocupa que la evolución del sistema y las alternativas de reforma comprometen la calidad de vida de la población, con situaciones alarmantes para muchas personas que tal vez no puedan acceder a una pensión digna. El GES, junto con las Facultades de Ciencias Económicas y de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas de la Universidad de Antioquia, convocó a este seminario para discutir la actualidad y las perspectivas del sistema pensional en Colombia. Se abre así un espacio de diálogo interdisciplinar, principalmente entre el derecho, la economía y la actuaría, para brindar pedagogía al público y colocar en el centro del debate los aspectos fundamentales que comprometen el futuro de las pensiones en el país. En esta Observación se recogen los principales aspectos de las intervenciones y la discusión final entre los expertos, a quienes se hace expreso un reconocimiento especial por su participación en el seminario y por su colaboración para hacer realidad esta publicación.

Suggested Citation

  • Grupo de Economía de la Salud & Jairo Humberto Restrepo, 2016. "Actualidad y perspectivas del sistema pensional colombiano," Observatorio Seguridad Social 16169, Grupo de Economía de la Salud.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000111:016169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/8903/1/UdeA_2016_PensionalSeguridadSocial.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jou, Judy & Techakehakij, Win, 2012. "International application of sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxation in obesity reduction: Factors that may influence policy effectiveness in country-specific contexts," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 83-90.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bo Yang & Xin Huang & Qin Liu & Shenglan Tang & Mary Story & Yiwen Chen & Maigeng Zhou, 2020. "Child Nutrition Trends Over the Past Two Decades and Challenges for Achieving Nutrition SDGs and National Targets in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Bonnet, Céline & Réquillart, Vincent, 2023. "The effects of taxation on the individual consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    3. Alsukait, Reem & Bleich, Sara & Wilde, Parke & Singh, Gitanjali & Folta, Sara, 2020. "Sugary drink excise tax policy process and implementation: Case study from Saudi Arabia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    4. Juan Carlos Caro & Shu Wen Ng & Ricardo Bonilla & Jorge Tovar & Barry M Popkin, 2017. "Sugary drinks taxation, projected consumption and fiscal revenues in Colombia: Evidence from a QUAIDS model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Adu, Derick T. & Li, Wenying & Sawadgo, Wendiam P.M., 2023. "Estimating the unintended impact of the North American free trade agreement on U.S. public health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    6. Irz, Xavier & Leroy, Pascal & Réquillart, Vincent & Soler, Louis-Georges, 2015. "Economic assessment of nutritional recommendations," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 188-210.
    7. Alberto Pench, 2020. "Time Allocation and Snacks and Sugar Sweetened Beverages Taxation," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 6(3), pages 469-492, November.
    8. Hagenaars, Luc Louis & Jeurissen, Patrick Paulus Theodoor & Klazinga, Niek Sieds, 2017. "The taxation of unhealthy energy-dense foods (EDFs) and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs): An overview of patterns observed in the policy content and policy context of 13 case studies," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(8), pages 887-894.
    9. Maria Eugenia Bonilla-Chacin & Roberto Magno Iglesias & Agustina Sara Suaya & Claudia Trezza & Claudia Macias, 2016. "Learning from the Mexican Experience with Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Energy-dense Foods of Low Nutritional Value: Poverty and Social Impact Analysis," Health, Nutrition and Population (HNP) Discussion Paper Series 106595, The World Bank.
    10. Zhai, Tianchang & Li, Lei & Wang, Jingjing & Si, Wei, 2022. "Will the consumption tax on sugar-sweetened beverages help promote healthy beverage consumption? Evidence from urban China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    11. Kuili Zhang & Bing Ran, 2022. "Active Health Governance—A Conceptual Framework Based on a Narrative Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14, February.
    12. Irz, Xavier & Leroy, Pascal & Réquillart, Vincent & Soler, Louis-Georges, 2016. "Welfare and sustainability effects of dietary recommendations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 139-155.
    13. Peter Lloyd & Donald MacLaren, 2019. "Should We Tax Sugar and If So How?," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 52(1), pages 19-40, March.
    14. Zhang, Ying & Li, Ruotong & Zhao, Qiran & Fan, Shenggen, 2023. "The impact of peer effect on students' consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages- instrumental variable evidence from north China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    15. Colchero, M.A. & Salgado, J.C. & Unar-Munguía, M. & Hernández-Ávila, M. & Rivera-Dommarco, J.A., 2015. "Price elasticity of the demand for sugar sweetened beverages and soft drinks in Mexico," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 129-137.
    16. Sharon S Nakhimovsky & Andrea B Feigl & Carlos Avila & Gael O’Sullivan & Elizabeth Macgregor-Skinner & Mark Spranca, 2016. "Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages to Reduce Overweight and Obesity in Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, September.
    17. Caro, Juan Carlos & Ng, Shu Wen & Taillie, Lindsey Smith & Popkin, Barry M., 2017. "Designing a tax to discourage unhealthy food and beverage purchases: The case of Chile," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 86-100.
    18. Young, Amanda & James, Kieran & Hassan, Abeer, 2022. "The role of regressive sugar tax in the soft drink industry levy (SDIL): A Marxist analysis," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    19. Gangl, Selina, 2021. "Do soda taxes affect the consumption and health of school-aged children? Evidence from France and Hungary," VfS Annual Conference 2020 (Virtual Conference): Gender Economics 224577, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association, revised 2021.
    20. Alberto Pench, 0. "Time Allocation and Snacks and Sugar Sweetened Beverages Taxation," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 0, pages 1-24.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000111:016169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Grupo de Economía de la Salud (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.