IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cnn/wpaper/25-003e.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Growth Promotion Policies When Taxes Cannot Be Raised

Author

Listed:
  • Ryo HORII
  • Katsunori Minami

Abstract

This paper examines the growth effects of R&D subsidies and public-funded basic research in an R&D-based endogenous growth model under circumstances where the government cannot raise taxes. We show that when individuals have enough life-cycle saving motives and R&D productivity is sufficiently high, g > r holds in equilibrium and the government can finance the required expenses while perpetually rolling over the debt. Whenever possible, debt-financed R&D subsidies always enhance short-run growth. However, long-term growth is promoted only when the initial g−r gap is wide enough. Even when the long-term effect is negative, the economy may benefit from the increased GDP during a long transition to the new BGP. We confirmed that the social return to R&D is always higher than the growth rate even though g > r. In an extended model, we examine the effect of enhancing public-funded basic research and find that it is particularly effective for low-growth economies. This paper examines the growth effects of R&D subsidies and public-funded basic research in an R&D-based endogenous growth model under circumstances where the government cannot raise taxes. We show that when individuals have enough life-cycle saving motives and R&D productivity is sufficiently high, g > r holds in equilibrium and the government can finance the required expenses while perpetually rolling over the debt. Whenever possible, debt-financed R&D subsidies always enhance short-run growth. However, long-term growth is promoted only when the initial g−r gap is wide enough. Even when the long-term effect is negative, the economy may benefit from the increased GDP during a long transition to the new BGP. We confirmed that the social return to R&D is always higher than the growth rate even though g > r. In an extended model, we examine the effect of enhancing public-funded basic research and find that it is particularly effective for low-growth economies. This paper examines the growth effects of R&D subsidies and public-funded basic research in an R&D-based endogenous growth model under circumstances where the government cannot raise taxes. We show that when individuals have enough life-cycle saving motives and R&D productivity is sufficiently high, g > r holds in equilibrium and the government can finance the required expenses while perpetually rolling over the debt. Whenever possible, debt-financed R&D subsidies always enhance short-run growth. However, long-term growth is promoted only when the initial g−r gap is wide enough. Even when the long-term effect is negative, the economy may benefit from the increased GDP during a long transition to the new BGP. We confirmed that the social return to R&D is always higher than the growth rate even though g > r. In an extended model, we examine the effect of enhancing public-funded basic research and find that it is particularly effective for low-growth economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryo HORII & Katsunori Minami, 2025. "Growth Promotion Policies When Taxes Cannot Be Raised," CIGS Working Paper Series 25-003E, The Canon Institute for Global Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:cnn:wpaper:25-003e
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cigs.canon/en/uploads/2025/02/WP25-003E_250203_horii.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas Bloom & John Van Reenen & Heidi Williams, 2019. "A toolkit of policies to promote innovation," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 10.
    2. Tirole, Jean, 1985. "Asset Bubbles and Overlapping Generations," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 53(6), pages 1499-1528, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Xiao-Qing & Wu, Tong & Zhong, Huaming & Su, Chi-Wei, 2023. "Bubble behaviors in nickel price: What roles do geopolitical risk and speculation play?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. Daisuke Ikeda & Toan Phan & Timothy Sablik, 2020. "Asset Bubbles and Global Imbalances," Richmond Fed Economic Brief, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 20, pages 1-4, January.
    3. Stefano Giglio & Matteo Maggiori & Johannes Stroebel, 2020. "Reply to “Rational Bubbles in UK Housing Markets”," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(4), pages 1767-1770, July.
    4. Xavier Raurich & Thomas Seegmuller, 2017. "Growth and Bubbles: The Interplay between Productive Investment and the Cost of Rearing Children," Working Papers halshs-01563555, HAL.
    5. Johannes Stroebel, 2016. "EconomicDynamics Interview: Johannes Stroebel on real estate dynamics," EconomicDynamics Newsletter, Review of Economic Dynamics, vol. 17(2), November.
    6. Clain-Chamosset-Yvrard Lise & Seegmuller Thomas, 2019. "Bubble on real estate: the role of altruism and fiscal policy," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 23(4), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Ken‐ichi Hashimoto & Ryonghun Im & Takuma Kunieda & Akihisa Shibata, 2022. "Asset bubbles, unemployment, and financial market frictions," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 60(4), pages 1806-1832, October.
    8. Hirano, Tomohiro & Inaba, Masaru & Yanagawa, Noriyuki, 2015. "Asset bubbles and bailouts," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(S), pages 71-89.
    9. Qureshi, Irfan & Park, Donghyun & Crespi, Gustavo Atilio & Benavente, Jose Miguel, 2021. "Trends and determinants of innovation in Asia and the Pacific vs. Latin America and the Caribbean," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 1287-1309.
    10. Uribe, Jorge & Fernández, Julián, 2014. "Burbujas financieras y comportamiento reciente de los mercados de acciones en América Latina," Revista Lecturas de Economía, Universidad de Antioquia, CIE, issue 81, pages 57-90, April.
    11. Ralf Martin & Sam Unsworth & Anna Valero & Dennis Verhoeven, 2020. "Innovation for a strong and sustainable recovery," CEP Covid-19 Analyses cepcovid-19-014, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    12. Franz R. Hahn, 2003. "Fully-Funded Public Old Age Pension Programs – Stranger Than Paradise?," WIFO Working Papers 203, WIFO.
    13. Waleed Khalid & Kashif Ur Rehman & Muhammad Kashif, 2019. "The Impact of Merger and Acquisition Firms on Stock Market Bubble," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(1), pages 335-342, March.
    14. Vladimir Asriyan & William Fuchs & Brett Green, 2019. "Liquidity Sentiments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(11), pages 3813-3848, November.
    15. Rao Aiyagari, S., 1988. "Nonmonetary steady states in stationary overlapping generations models with long lived agents and discounting: Multiplicity, optimality, and consumption smoothing," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 102-127, June.
    16. Queirós, Francisco, 2024. "Asset bubbles and product market competition," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 19(1), January.
    17. Tsai, I-Chun & Chiang, Shu-Hen, 2019. "Exuberance and spillovers in housing markets: Evidence from first- and second-tier cities in China," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 75-86.
    18. Kiminori Matsuyama, 1989. "Serial Correlation of Sunspot Equilibria (Rational Bubbles) in Two Popular Models of Monetary Economies," Discussion Papers 827, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    19. Raurich, Xavier & Seegmuller, Thomas, 2019. "On the interplay between speculative bubbles and productive investment," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 400-420.
    20. Nina Biljanovska & Lucyna Gornicka & Alexandros Vardoulakis, 2019. "Optimal Macroprudential Policy and Asset Price Bubbles," IMF Working Papers 2019/184, International Monetary Fund.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cnn:wpaper:25-003e. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The Canon Institute for Global Studies (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/canonjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.