IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/clg/wpaper/2008-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Indivisible Labor in a Small Open Economy Model

Author

Listed:
  • Zuzana Janko

    (University of Calgary)

Abstract

In this paper, I re-examined standard preferences in a small open economy (SOE) model with indivisible labor calibrated to Canada. It is well known that dynamic small open economy models rely on Greenwood, Hercowitz and Huffman (1988) preferences to match the countercyclical trade balance observed in open economies, as well as other second moments. In contrast, standard preferences a la King, Plosser and Rebelo (1988) are abandoned in this literature and are commonly labeled as ineffective, due to their inability to yield a countercyclical trade balance. Contrary to prior claims, this paper shows that a SOE model with standard preferences and indivisible labor obtains a countercyclical trade balance and well matches main empirical regularities that emerge in open economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Zuzana Janko, "undated". "Indivisible Labor in a Small Open Economy Model," Working Papers 2008-36, Department of Economics, University of Calgary, revised 01 Dec 2008.
  • Handle: RePEc:clg:wpaper:2008-36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:clg:wpaper:2008-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Department of Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/declgca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.