IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chu/wpaper/24-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do Participation Rates V ticipation Rates Vary with P y with Participation P ticipation Payments in yments in Laboratory Experiments?

Author

Listed:
  • Huizhen Zhong

    (College of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural Universit)

  • Cary Deck

    (University of Alabama and Economic Science Institute, Chapman University)

  • Daniel J. Henderson

    (Department of Economics, Finance and Legal Studies, University of Alabama)

Abstract

This paper reports a series of experiments designed to evaluate how the advertised participation payment impacts participation rates in laboratory experiments. Our initial goal was to generate variation in the participation rate as a means to control for selection bias when evaluating treatment efects in common laboratory experiments. Initially, we varied the advertised participation payment to 1734 people from $5 to $15 using standard email recruitment procedures, but found no statistical evidence this impacted the participation rate. A second study increased the advertised payment up to $100. Here, we fnd marginally signifcant statistical evidence that the advertised participation payment afects the participation rate when payments are large. To combat skepticism of our results, we also conducted a third study in which verbal ofers were made. Here, we found no statistically signifcant increase in participation rates when the participation payment increased from $5 to $10. Finally, we conducted an experiment similar to the frst one at a separate university. We found no statistically signifcant increase in participation rates when the participation payment increased from $7 to $15. The combined results from our four experiments suggest moderate variation in the advertised participation payment from standard levels has little impact on participation rates in typical laboratory experiments. Rather, generating useful variation in participation rates likely requires much larger participation payments and/or larger potential subject pools than are common in laboratory experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Huizhen Zhong & Cary Deck & Daniel J. Henderson, 2024. "Do Participation Rates V ticipation Rates Vary with P y with Participation P ticipation Payments in yments in Laboratory Experiments?," Working Papers 24-16, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:chu:wpaper:24-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/esi_working_papers/412/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    participation payment; selection bias; treatment efect; laboratory experiments;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chu:wpaper:24-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Megan Luetje (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esichus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.