IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chf/rpseri/rp2518.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Unintended Effects of Ethical Decision Aids in Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Malte Baader

    (University of Zurich - Department Finance)

  • Maxim Egorov

    (Zeppelin University Friedrichshafen)

  • Baiba Renerte

    (University of Zurich - Department of Finance)

  • Carmen Tanner

    (University of Zurich - Department of Finance; Zeppelin University Friedrichshafen)

  • Alexander F. Wagner

    (University of Zurich - Department of Finance; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Swiss Finance Institute)

  • Nicole Witt

    (Zeppelin University Friedrichshafen)

Abstract

Unethical behavior, deception, and fraud are major concerns in corporate governance. This paper examines the effectiveness of contemplation questions (CQs) as decision aids for employees facing ethical dilemmas. CQs, such as "Will the reputation of our company be damaged if my decision is made public?" are intended to activate moral agency and prompt employees to consider their actions from various perspectives (e.g., self, peers, company). Despite being used by 44% of S&P 200 and Fortune Global 200 companies, their effectiveness remains untested. Through two pre-registered, incentivized vignette experiments, we systematically investigate the causal effect of CQs on ethical decisionmaking. In Study 1 (N = 1,986), merely presenting CQs had no impact on ethical decisions. In Study 2 (N = 1,322), actively engaging participants by requiring explicit answers to CQs led to marginally more ethical decisions among individuals with high moral identity but significantly fewer ethical decisions among those with low moral identity. These findings align with a conceptual framework of motivated moral reasoning and suggest that while CQs can positively affect some individuals, they also backfire, promoting unethical behavior precisely in those already predisposed to such tendencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Malte Baader & Maxim Egorov & Baiba Renerte & Carmen Tanner & Alexander F. Wagner & Nicole Witt, 2025. "The Unintended Effects of Ethical Decision Aids in Organizations," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 25-18, Swiss Finance Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp2518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5136031
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp2518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ridima Mittal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fameech.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.