IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chf/rpseri/rp24109.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Puzzle of ESG Fund Fees

Author

Listed:
  • Aaron J. Black

    (University of St. Gallen; Swiss Finance Institute)

  • Julian F Kölbel

    (University of St. Gallen - School of Finance; MIT Sloan; Swiss Finance Institute)

Abstract

This paper documents that ESG funds in the U.S. charge net expense ratios that are 9.5 to 12.7 basis points lower than those of non-ESG funds. This contrasts with the existing literature on investors' willingness to pay for ESG. The fee difference is driven by the use of waivers, which offset the higher gross expense ratios of ESG funds. We explore three explanations consistent with these findings: (1) heightened competition among ESG funds exerts downward pressure on fees, (2) ESG funds exhibit lower expected returns, and (3) fund families strategically use ESG funds with low fees to cross-sell higher-fee funds.

Suggested Citation

  • Aaron J. Black & Julian F Kölbel, 2024. "The Puzzle of ESG Fund Fees," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 24-109, Swiss Finance Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp24109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5053459
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ESG; Mutual Funds; Competition;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp24109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ridima Mittal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fameech.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.