IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chf/rpseri/rp23120.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Serious Errors Impair an Assessment of Forest Carbon Projects: A Rebuttal Of West Et Al. (2023)

Author

Listed:
  • Edward Mitchard

    (University of Edinburgh and Space Intelligence)

  • Harry Carstairs

    (Space Intelligence)

  • Riccardo Cosenza

    (Università della Svizzera Italiana)

  • Sassan S. Saatchi

    (California Institute of Technology, University of California, Los Angeles and CTrees)

  • Jason Funk

    (Conservation International)

  • Paula Nieto Quintano

    (Space Intelligence)

  • Thom Brade

    (Space Intelligence)

  • Iain M. McNicol

    (University of Edinburgh and Space Intelligence)

  • Patrick Meir

    (University of Edinburgh)

  • Murray B. Collins

    (Space Intelligence)

  • Eric Nowak

    (Università della Svizzera Italiana, Swiss Finance Institute and VCS Advisory Group)

Abstract

Independent retrospective analyses of the effectiveness of reducing deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) projects are vital to ensure climate change benefits are being delivered. A recent study in Science by West et al. (1) appeared therefore to be a timely alert that the majority of projects operating in the 2010s failed to reduce deforestation rates. Unfortunately, their analysis suffered from major flaws in the choice of underlying data, resulting in poorly matched and unstable counterfactual scenarios. These were compounded by calculation errors, biasing the study against finding that projects significantly reduced deforestation. This flawed analysis of 24 projects unfairly condemned all 100+ REDD projects, and risks cutting off finance for protecting vulnerable tropical forests from destruction at a time when funding needs to grow rapidly.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward Mitchard & Harry Carstairs & Riccardo Cosenza & Sassan S. Saatchi & Jason Funk & Paula Nieto Quintano & Thom Brade & Iain M. McNicol & Patrick Meir & Murray B. Collins & Eric Nowak, 2023. "Serious Errors Impair an Assessment of Forest Carbon Projects: A Rebuttal Of West Et Al. (2023)," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 23-120, Swiss Finance Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp23120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4661972
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp23120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ridima Mittal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fameech.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.