IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cgd/wpaper/552.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Analysis of Clinical Knowledge, Absenteeism, and Availability of Resources for Maternal and Child Health: A Cross-Sectional Quality of Care Study in 10 African Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Di Giorgio

    (World Bank)

  • David K. Evans

    (Center for Global Development)

  • Magnus Lindelow

    (World Bank)

  • Son Nam Nguyen

    (World Bank)

  • Jakob Svensson

    (Institute for International Economic Studies, Stockholm University)

  • Waly Wane

    (World Bank)

  • Anna Welander Tärneberg

    (Center for Economic Demography and Department of Economic History, Lund University School of Economics and Management)

Abstract

Objective: Assess the quality of health care across African countries based on health providers’ clinical knowledge, their clinic attendance, and drug availability, with a focus on seven conditions accounting for a large share of child and maternal mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa: malaria, tuberculosis, diarrhea, pneumonia, diabetes, neonatal asphyxia and post-partum hemorrhage. Methods: With nationally representative, cross-sectional data from ten countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, collected using clinical vignettes (to assess provider knowledge), unannounced visits (to assess provider absenteeism), and visual inspections of facilities (to assess availability of drugs and equipment), we assess whether health providers are available and have sufficient knowledge and means to diagnose and treat patients suffering from common conditions amenable to primary health care. We draw on data from 8,061 primary and secondary care facilities in Kenya, Madagascar, Mozambique, Nigeria, Niger, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Togo, and Uganda, and 22,746 health workers including doctors, clinical officers, nurses, and community health workers. Facilities were selected using a multistage cluster-sampling design to ensure data were representative of rural and urban areas, private and public facilities, and of different facility types. These data were gathered under the Service Delivery Indicators program. Results: Across all conditions and countries, health care providers were able to correctly diagnose 64% (95% CI 0.62-0.65) of the clinical vignette cases, and in 45% (95% CI 0.43-0.46) of the cases, the treatment plan was aligned with the correct diagnosis. For diarrhea and pneumonia, two common causes of under- five deaths, 27% (95% CI 0.25-0.29) of the providers correctly diagnosed and prescribed the appropriate treatment for both conditions. On average, 70% of health workers were present in the facilities to provide care during facility hours when those workers are scheduled to be on duty. Taken together, we estimate that the likelihood that a facility has at least one staff present with competency and key inputs required to provide child, neonatal, and maternity care that meets minimum quality standards is 14%. On average, poor clinical knowledge is a greater constraint in care readiness than drug availability or health workers’ absenteeism in the 10 countries. However, we document substantial heterogeneity across countries in the extent to which drug availability and absenteeism matter quantitatively. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the need to boost the knowledge of health care workers to achieve greater care readiness. Training programs have shown mixed results, so systems may need to adopt a combination of competency-based pre-service and in-service training for health care providers (with evaluation to ensure the effectiveness of the training), and hiring practices that ensure the most prepared workers enter the systems. We conclude that in settings where clinical knowledge is poor, improving drug availability or reducing health workers’ absenteeism would only modestly increase the average care readiness that meets minimum quality standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Di Giorgio & David K. Evans & Magnus Lindelow & Son Nam Nguyen & Jakob Svensson & Waly Wane & Anna Welander Tärneberg, 2020. "An Analysis of Clinical Knowledge, Absenteeism, and Availability of Resources for Maternal and Child Health: A Cross-Sectional Quality of Care Study in 10 African Countries," Working Papers 552, Center for Global Development.
  • Handle: RePEc:cgd:wpaper:552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cgdev.org/publication/analysis-clinical-knowledge-absenteeism-and-availability-resources-maternal-and-child?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacky Mathonnat, 2024. "« Transforming Challenge into Action: Expanding Health Coverage for All » at the World Bank Group and IMF Spring Meetings 2024," Post-Print hal-04603235, HAL.
    2. Juliet Mwanga-Amumpaire & Tobias Alfvén & Celestino Obua & Karin Källander & Richard Migisha & Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg & Grace Ndeezi & Joan Nakayaga Kalyango, 2021. "Appropriateness of Care for Common Childhood Infections at Low-Level Private Health Facilities in a Rural District in Western Uganda," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Han Zhang & Günther Fink & Jessica Cohen, 2021. "The impact of health worker absenteeism on patient health care seeking behavior, testing and treatment: A longitudinal analysis in Uganda," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Adrien Allorant & Nancy Fullman & Hannah H. Leslie & Moussa Sarr & Daouda Gueye & Eliudi Eliakimu & Jon Wakefield & Joseph L. Dieleman & David Pigott & Nancy Puttkammer & Robert C. Reiner, 2023. "A small area model to assess temporal trends and sub-national disparities in healthcare quality," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cgd:wpaper:552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publications Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cgdevus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.