Author
Listed:
- Michael Wolosin
- Donna Lee
Abstract
The United States, as a nation with a strong connection to its large land base, has been a supporter over many years of forest management and conservation. Because this long-held vision is shared across a broad spectrum of the US public, the United States has been a strong supporter of using foreign assistance to also help other countries protect their forests. US views on forests as they relate to climate change, however, are more complex. The emergence and continued prioritization of forest protection and restoration in international climate negotiations has largely been welcomed by recent US administrations. However, two key routes available for increasing US funding for international forests – assistance and regulation – are both challenging. Increasing development assistance is a political challenge because of continuing concerns over the fiscal health of the US economy, and using such funds to pay other countries directly for forest emission reductions also faces operational challenges. Passing new legislation through Congress is unlikely for some years given Republican opposition to climate policies. These difficult “big-P” Political issues strongly determine the existence and amount of US investments in international forests, while the “small-p” politics of US constituencies including NGOs and the private sector shape that investment. However, while challenging, political winds in the United States can change quickly and opportunities for international forest finance may present themselves in the coming years. A shift in the Republican party to more moderate views or efforts to move towards results-based foreign assistance more generally could benefit climate change-related assistance, as emissions are quantifiable metrics. Regulation under existing authority could have the potential flexibility to include international mitigation. Finally, businesses that have made public pledges to deforestation-free supply chains are keen to align policy approaches with such pledges, and could breathe new life into support for reducing emissions from forests.
Suggested Citation
Michael Wolosin & Donna Lee, 2014.
"US Support for REDD+: Reflections on the Past and Future Outlook,"
Policy Papers
48, Center for Global Development.
Handle:
RePEc:cgd:ppaper:48
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cgd:ppaper:48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publications Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cgdevus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.