IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cgd/ppaper/286.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

iProSE: A Scale for Assessing Progress on Institutional Use of Evidence to Inform Priority Setting in Health

Author

Listed:
  • Adrian Gheorghe

    (Center for Global Development)

  • Sophie Gulliver

    (Center for Global Development)

  • Abha Mehndiratta

    (Center for Global Development)

  • Javier Guzman

    (Center for Global Development)

  • Peter Baker

    (Center for Global Development)

Abstract

Rigorous, explicit, evidence-informed priority-setting (EIPS) in healthcare is an essential instrument for achieving value for money in Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Growing pressures on healthcare budgets, combined with the post-COVID-19 fiscal crises and a plateauing of development assistance for health, make institutionalising of EIPS a particularly critical and timely policy goal. We introduce iProSE—the iDSI Progression Scale for institutionalising EIPS in healthcare. iProSE is a self-assessment scale aiming to help countries understand how far they have progressed in institutionalising EIPS and what can be their future priorities and to help development partners better tailor their country support in this area. We propose an index resulting from the assessment of eight aspirational statements on EIPS: two statements relate to key spending decisions (“What health technologies to cover from public funds?” and “At what prices to procure health technologies from public funds?”), and six statements relate to enabling factors for institutionalising EIPS. Statements are scored on the basis of information available in official documents against the extent to which the statements fall on an implementation spectrum ranging from policy intention to full, systematic implementation. Based on the scored statements, EIPS institutionalisation can be categorised as Foundational, Breakthrough, Consolidating, or Mature. An example of application of iProSE is presented capturing India’s progress in moving from Breakthrough in 2016 to Consolidating in 2022.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrian Gheorghe & Sophie Gulliver & Abha Mehndiratta & Javier Guzman & Peter Baker, 2023. "iProSE: A Scale for Assessing Progress on Institutional Use of Evidence to Inform Priority Setting in Health," Policy Papers 286, Center for Global Development.
  • Handle: RePEc:cgd:ppaper:286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cgdev.org/publication/iprose-scale-assessing-progress-institutional-use-evidence-inform-priority-setting?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cgd:ppaper:286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publications Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cgdevus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.