IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_11226.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Is Competition Only One Click Away? The Digital Markets Act Impact on Google Maps

Author

Listed:
  • Louis-Daniel Pape
  • Michelangelo Rossi

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of the European Union’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) on user search behaviour and traffic to online mapping services, focusing on recent design changes to Google’s search results page. In January 2024, Google modified how location-based queries are displayed for users in the EU by removing clickable maps and direct links to Google Maps. We leverage this change and implement a difference-in-differences (DiD) approach comparing EU and non-EU countries to evaluate how increased friction in accessing Google Maps affects search volumes and traffic patterns. We document a significant increase of over 21% in search queries for maps and google maps, largely redirecting users back to Google Maps. While searches for apple maps increased modestly, no significant changes are observed for other competitors such as bing maps. Organic desktop traffic to www.google.com/maps rose by approximately 40%, with no corresponding change in direct traffic or overall desktop visits. A placebo test using mobile traffic shows no effect, confirming the DMA as the causal driver. Engagement metrics suggest a modest decline in user experience. Overall, our findings indicate that while the DMA altered search user behavior, it did not substantially increase traffic to Google’s competitors or reduce usage of Google’s mapping services.

Suggested Citation

  • Louis-Daniel Pape & Michelangelo Rossi, 2024. "Is Competition Only One Click Away? The Digital Markets Act Impact on Google Maps," CESifo Working Paper Series 11226, CESifo.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_11226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp11226.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    self-preferencing; digital platforms; online search; Digital Markets Act;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L41 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Monopolization; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices
    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
    • K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_11226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.