IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cep/cepsps/05.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessment, Qualifications And Standards: UK Compared To France, Germany, Singapore And The US

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Bertrand
  • Andy Green
  • Ansgar Richter
  • Marcus Rubin
  • Hilary Steedman
  • Klaus Weber

Abstract

This Annex contains the technical work which underpins Into the 21st Century. It describes in detail the assessment procedures and qualifications offered in France, Germany, Singapore and USA compared to the UK.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Bertrand & Andy Green & Ansgar Richter & Marcus Rubin & Hilary Steedman & Klaus Weber, 1997. "Assessment, Qualifications And Standards: UK Compared To France, Germany, Singapore And The US," CEP Reports 05, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    • Handle: RePEc:cep:cepsps:05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clark, Damon & Fahr, René, 2001. "The Promise of Workplace Training for Non-College-Bound Youth: Theory and Evidence from German Apprenticeship," IZA Discussion Papers 378, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Ansgar Richter, 1998. "Qualifications in the German construction industry: stocks, flows and comparisons with the British construction sector," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 581-592.
    3. Steedman, H., 1997. "Recent trends in engineering and construction skill formation - UK and Germany compared," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 20331, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cep:cepsps:05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/special-reports/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.