IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cep/cepdps/dp2073.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

What fueled the illicit opioid epidemic? New evidence from a takeover of white powder heroin markets

Author

Listed:
  • J. Travis Donahoe
  • Adam Soliman

Abstract

In recent years, the majority of drug overdose deaths in the U.S. have involved illicitly-produced opioids (primarily heroin and fentanyl), overtaking prescription opioids as the main driver of the opioid epidemic. In this paper, we document a previously unexplored shift in heroin markets that played a critical role in driving this transition: the takeover of white powder heroin production by Mexican Drug Trafficking Organizations (DTOs) from Colombian DTOs beginning in 2012, which resulted in heroin that was adulterated with fentanyl and more variable in potency. Using a difference-in-differences approach that exploits the fact that white powder heroin markets were exposed to these heroin quality shocks while black tar heroin markets were not, we find that they increased heroin and fentanyl death rates by roughly 230% and 890%, respectively, from 2012 to 2019. Previously studied legal market interventions cannot explain these effects, and we shed light on key aspects of the evolving epidemic that were thus far unexplained. We conclude that shocks to heroin quality are a major determinant of the transition to the illicit opioid waves of the epidemic.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Travis Donahoe & Adam Soliman, 2025. "What fueled the illicit opioid epidemic? New evidence from a takeover of white powder heroin markets," CEP Discussion Papers dp2073, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
  • Handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp2073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp2073.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    overdose epidemic; illicit opioids; segmented market ; Crime;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp2073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/discussion-papers/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.