IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cep/cepdps/dp0036.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Note in the Polish State-Owned Enterprise Sector in 1990

Author

Listed:
  • M Schaffer

Abstract

This paper presents a preliminary analysis of the performance of the Polish state-owned enterprise sector in 1990, with particular attention to wages, output, profitability, and the contribution of enterprise taxation to the state budget. A new piece of empirical evidence presented in the paper is an index of industrial production by the state-owned sector calculated by the author using data on physical output of principal products. The main points of the paper are: (1) Polish state-owned enterprises are "worker-managed firms". This helps explain some of the peculiar features of enterprise sector performance in 1990: high profits and the absence of bankruptcies despite a huge drop in output; a very large drop in real wages January 1990 followed by a steady increase and the consequent failure of the Government's tax-based incomes policy to be binding constraint until late in 1990; and the slow rate of labour shedding. (2) The author's industrial production index shows a drop in state sector output in 1990 of about 21%, not much less than the 25% drop in the official industrial sales index. Gershenkron-type biases are apparently small. (3) The use of monopoly power by these worker-managed firms may possibly account for some, but not most, of the decrease in output. (4) Wage movements explain much of the movement in enterprise profitability in 1989-90. In particular, about 2/3 of the drop in profitability over January-December 1990 can be accounted for by an increase in real wage costs, and about 1/3 to an increase in the real exchange rate. Other factors were also at work, however. (5) The most important consequences of the rises in the real wage and real wage costs were, first, the shift of tax revenue from profit taxes to wage taxes, and, second, the spending of most of the additional wage tax revenues on higher real pension payments because pensions are indexed to the wage. It is estimated in the paper that by the end of the period January-December 1990 this process had added something like 7% to the monthly central budget deficit. This shift in the division of enterprise surpluses from profits to wages thus contributed substantially to the emergence of the current budgetary problems.

Suggested Citation

  • M Schaffer, 1991. "A Note in the Polish State-Owned Enterprise Sector in 1990," CEP Discussion Papers dp0036, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
  • Handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrzej Baniak, 1999. "Unilateral Spillovers Between East and West and Quality Competition," CASE-CEU Working Papers 0032, CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research.
    2. Karp, Larry & Stefanou, Spiro, 1991. "Polish Agriculture in Transition: Does it Hurt to be Slapped by an Invisible Hand?," CUDARE Working Papers 198594, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    3. Jan Svejnar, 1991. "Microeconomic Issues in the Transition to a Market Economy," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 5(4), pages 123-138, Fall.
    4. Raiser, Martin, 1992. "Soft budget constraints: An institutional interpretation of stylised facts in economic transformation in Central Eastern Europe," Kiel Working Papers 549, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/discussion-papers/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.