IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cel/report/71.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

BARWAGE: Discretion and (de)centralization in wage bargaining in the construction, hospitality, urban transport and waste management sectors: A Study on Austria

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Fidrmuc
  • Marta Kahancová

Abstract

This report identifies and analyses the wage setting practices in Austria, focusing on four specific sectors – construction, hospitality, urban transport, and waste management. As part of the BARWAGE project, the report seeks to understand how exactly wage is setting in these sectors, with a focus on low-wage workers (if relevant) is occurring, which actors are involved, what is the starting point of this process and where does it lead to in terms of institutional stability or change of the wage setting institutions. The findings show that in the highly coordinated bargaining system in Austria, wage setting at the centralized level leaves little discretion for negotiating wages at the company level. Even if wage levels vary across firms and sectors, the way in which parts of the wage are subject to individual discretion or company-level bargaining are determined by centralized procedures. In turn, Austria is more resilient to bargaining decentralization than other countries; and even if some processes within wage bargaining are shifted to the company level, this shift is highly coordinated.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Fidrmuc & Marta Kahancová, 2024. "BARWAGE: Discretion and (de)centralization in wage bargaining in the construction, hospitality, urban transport and waste management sectors: A Study on Austria," Research Reports 71, Central European Labour Studies Institute (CELSI).
  • Handle: RePEc:cel:report:71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://celsi.sk/media/research_reports/CELSI_RR_71.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:clr:wugarc:y:2017v:43i:01p:65 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cel:report:71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Martin Kahanec (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/celsisk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.