IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cel/report/22.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bargaining and Social Dialogue at the Public Sector (BARSOP), Country Study: Slovakia

Author

Listed:
  • Mária Sedláková
  • Marta Kahancová

Abstract

This report examines the evolution and role of industrial relations in the public sector in Slovakia since 2000 and studies three sub-sectors of the public sector: primary education, hospitals and a part of local government, childcare facilities. The report uses document and data analysis, semi-structured interviews with policy makers at national level and social partners’ representatives (at national, sector and local levels), interview transcripts, analyses and findings of authors’ earlier projects, which also focused on industrial relations in public sector. Unlike in other countries, the crisis in Slovakia did not yield significant employment cuts, however, austerity measures concentrated on wage freezes across various domains of the public sector. The crisis indirectly affected industrial relations and working conditions in Slovakia, including the public sector, which has witnessed heightened mobilization via the new actors that engaged in new strategies and became active via protests, petitions and demonstrations. This means that the strategies for gaining influence shifted from established bargaining channels to the public space. Despite that, multi-employer and single-employer collective bargaining structures remained stable. Increasing regulation of working conditions via legislative solutions became the other trend. This paper argues that a focus on legislative solutions together with the tendency of unions to seek political support by political parties in the government undermines the role of collective bargaining. Across all studied subsectors, social partners actively voiced their criticisms on reform proposals as well as proposed legislative changes, which in most cases concerned wage regulations. Nevertheless, a direct relationship between reform efforts and changes in the quality of provided public services is difficult to establish. This report was written for the Bargaining and Social Dialogue in the Public Sector (BARSOP) project, financed by the European Commission, Industrial Relations and Social Dialogue Programme (project VS/2016/0107) Disclaimer excluding Commission responsibility This communication related to the action BARSOP is made by the beneficiaries and it reflects only the author’s view. The Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains

Suggested Citation

  • Mária Sedláková & Marta Kahancová, 2018. "Bargaining and Social Dialogue at the Public Sector (BARSOP), Country Study: Slovakia," Research Reports 22, Central European Labour Studies Institute (CELSI).
  • Handle: RePEc:cel:report:22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://celsi.sk/media/research_reports/RR22.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marta Kahancová, 2016. "The rise of the dual labour market: fighting precarious employment in the new member states through industrial relations (PRECARIR) Country report: Slovakia," Research Reports 19, Central European Labour Studies Institute (CELSI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marta Kahancová & Monika Martišková & Gábor Szüdi, 2019. "Enhancing the Effectiveness of Social Dialogue Articulation in Europe (EESDA), National report: Slovakia," Research Reports 29, Central European Labour Studies Institute (CELSI).
    2. Gábor Szüdi & Jakub Kostolný & Marta Kahancová, 2018. "BARCOM REPORT 2: Bargaining Systems in the Commerce Sector," Research Reports 24, Central European Labour Studies Institute (CELSI).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cel:report:22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Martin Kahanec (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/celsisk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.