IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdp/texdis/td416.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Diferença entre perfis de brasileiros idosos no início dos anos 2000

Author

Listed:
  • Mônica Rebouças

    (Unifesp)

  • Marília Miranda Forte Gomes

    (Cedeplar-UFMG)

  • Marina Guimarães Paes de Barros

    (Master in Domography)

  • Fabiane Vaz

    (UNB)

  • Maurício Gomes Pereira

    (UNB)

  • Luiz Roberto Ramos

    (Unifesp)

Abstract

Considering the importance of the Brazilian aging, this work had aimed to compare the input of the second millennium the secondary data on the elderly in four Brazilian states, where it had been done research on the subject, which are, São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais and Ceará. The information was at the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics and the Ministry of Health. Survey results suggest it be possible outline the aging in the country by Brazilian state, after the year 2000, offering items be enhanced in places less fortunate, like the northeast, as well as on the benchmarking of information on activities of daily living that are obtained through questions that combine dissimilar difficulties in performing various activities by creating uncertainty in the interpretation of responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Mônica Rebouças & Marília Miranda Forte Gomes & Marina Guimarães Paes de Barros & Fabiane Vaz & Maurício Gomes Pereira & Luiz Roberto Ramos, 2011. "Diferença entre perfis de brasileiros idosos no início dos anos 2000," Textos para Discussão Cedeplar-UFMG td416, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdp:texdis:td416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cedeplar.ufmg.br/pesquisas/td/TD%20416.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    elderly; health indicators; functional ability; activities of daily living;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Y80 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Related Disciplines - - - Related Disciplines

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdp:texdis:td416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gustavo Britto (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pufmgbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.