IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/uctcwp/qt9df5b5ts.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Towards an Accessible City: Empirical Measurement and Modeling of Access to Urban Opportunities for those with Vision Impairments, Using Remote Infrared Audible Signage

Author

Listed:
  • Marston, James R

Abstract

This paper examines the problems of defining and measuring access for blind travelers in an urban transit environment. Current accessibility measures do little to account for individual differences or the barriers faced by people with restricted mobility. Independent access to transit and activities in the urban environment are often denied or restricted for those with vision impairments. Their freedom of movement is not blocked by physical obstacles, but by information, signs, and spatial knowledge that are hard to access without vision. In this sense, services and facilities are considered inaccessible if people with limited or no vision lack the information necessary to adequately use them. Thirty legally blind people made five simulated transfers to different transit modes at a transportation terminal to identify specific barriers to successful travel. Regular blind mobility methods were tested against a Remote Infrared Audible Signage (RIAS) condition to determine if the devices offered a suitable replacement for typical visual cues and information needed for efficient travel and use of transit. The difficulties of accessing various transit locations and performing necessary tasks were measured, in both conditions, and the extra time penalties were compared and modeled showing the travel constraints of vision loss and the efficacy of using RIAS to increase access. RIAS provided superior travel times, increased independence, and decreased error production. A survey examined differences reported by blind travelers before and after exposure to RIAS. Many wayfinding tasks faced by transit users were shown to be quite difficult with normal navigation skills and aids, but presented little or no difficulty when using RIAS. High resistance to make mode transfers, especially in new environments, was reported. Inaccessible transit caused "non-trips" and also reduced travel and activity participation. RIAS revealed a hidden demand to travel more often, with greater safety, independence, and efficiency. These additional audible cues were perceived as enabling the users to access many more types of activities, such as education, employment, recreational, and entertainment. High monetary benefits were placed on the ability to travel independently and to gain access to urban opportunities, including increased income from employment.

Suggested Citation

  • Marston, James R, 2002. "Towards an Accessible City: Empirical Measurement and Modeling of Access to Urban Opportunities for those with Vision Impairments, Using Remote Infrared Audible Signage," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9df5b5ts, University of California Transportation Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt9df5b5ts
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/9df5b5ts.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gavin R. Jenkins & Hon K. Yuen & Laura K. Vogtle, 2015. "Experience of Multisensory Environments in Public Space among People with Visual Impairment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Nuernberger, Andrea, 2008. "Presenting Accessibility to Mobility-Impaired Travelers," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5zr22745, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Alexandra Tessier & Isabelle GĂ©linas & Normand Boucher & Claire Croteau & Diane Morin & Philippe S. Archambault, 2024. "Enhancing Employment Access for People with Disabilities through Transportation: Insights from Workers with Disabilities, Employers, and Transportation Providers," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-29, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt9df5b5ts. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.