IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/uctcwp/qt2jj604pk.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Adaptive Optimization of Infrastructure Maintenance and Inspection Decisions under Performance Model Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Madanat, S M
  • Durango, Pablo L
  • Guillaumot, Vincent M

Abstract

Infrastructure management systems assist agencies in making decisions regarding maintenance, repair, and reconstruction of the facilities under their jurisdiction. The objective in these decision-making tools is to minimize the total expected cost of managing a system of facilities over a given planning horizon. Recent optimization models account for the uncertainty in the selection of facility performance models through an adaptive control approach. In this paper, we extend the methodology to jointly determine when to inspect and what maintenance activity to perform, while taking into account uncertainty in measuring facility condition. A parametric study is performed to analyze the effect of the initial performance model uncertainty and bias on the expected total cost of managing a facility over a finite horizon. The parametric study shows that reducing model uncertainty leads, as expected, to lower costs. The results also indicate that reducing the initial variance in model uncertainty is more important than reducing the initial bias. In addition, our study shows that cost savings can result from relaxing the constraint of a fixed inspection schedule.

Suggested Citation

  • Madanat, S M & Durango, Pablo L & Guillaumot, Vincent M, 2002. "Adaptive Optimization of Infrastructure Maintenance and Inspection Decisions under Performance Model Uncertainty," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2jj604pk, University of California Transportation Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt2jj604pk
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/2jj604pk.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Humplick, Frannie, 1992. "Highway pavement distress evaluation: Modeling measurement error," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 135-154, April.
    2. Morton Klein, 1962. "Inspection--Maintenance--Replacement Schedules Under Markovian Deterioration," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 25-32, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Durango-Cohen, Pablo L. & Madanat, Samer M., 2008. "Optimization of inspection and maintenance decisions for infrastructure facilities under performance model uncertainty: A quasi-Bayes approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(8), pages 1074-1085, October.
    2. Durango-Cohen, Pablo L., 2007. "A time series analysis framework for transportation infrastructure management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 493-505, June.
    3. Lodewijk Kallenberg, 2013. "Derman’s book as inspiration: some results on LP for MDPs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 208(1), pages 63-94, September.
    4. Prozzi, J A & Madanat, S M, 2004. "Development of Pavement Performance Models by Combining Experimental and Field Data," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt6cf8v5cw, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. Andrei Sleptchenko & M. Eric Johnson, 2015. "Maintaining Secure and Reliable Distributed Control Systems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 103-117, February.
    6. Kurt, Murat & Kharoufeh, Jeffrey P., 2010. "Optimally maintaining a Markovian deteriorating system with limited imperfect repairs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 368-380, September.
    7. Nooshin Salari & Viliam Makis, 2020. "Application of Markov renewal theory and semi‐Markov decision processes in maintenance modeling and optimization of multi‐unit systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(7), pages 548-558, October.
    8. Wallace J. Hopp & Sung‐Chi Wu, 1988. "Multiaction maintenance under markovian deterioration and incomplete state information," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(5), pages 447-462, October.
    9. Chu, Chih-Yuan & Durango-Cohen, Pablo L., 2008. "Estimation of dynamic performance models for transportation infrastructure using panel data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 57-81, January.
    10. Prozzi, Jorge A, 2001. "Modeling Pavement Performance by Combining Field and Experimental Data," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1gx2425x, University of California Transportation Center.
    11. Mishalani, Rabi G. & Gong, Liying, 2009. "Optimal infrastructure condition sampling over space and time for maintenance decision-making under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 311-324, March.
    12. Mishalani, Rabi G. & Koutsopoulos, Haris N., 2002. "Modeling the spatial behavior of infrastructure condition," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 171-194, February.
    13. Swei, Omar & Gillen, David & Onayev, Anuarbek, 2021. "Improving productivity measures of producing transportation infrastructure using quality-adjusted price indices," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 372-381.
    14. Bloch-Mercier, Sophie, 2002. "A preventive maintenance policy with sequential checking procedure for a Markov deteriorating system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(3), pages 548-576, November.
    15. Kuhn, Kenneth D. & Madanat, Samer M., 2005. "Robust Maintenance Policies for Markovian Systems under Model Uncertainty," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1d85j6mt, University of California Transportation Center.
    16. Ali Dogramaci & Nelson M. Fraiman, 2004. "Replacement Decisions with Maintenance Under Uncertainty: An Imbedded Optimal Control Model," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 785-794, October.
    17. Kobayashi, Kiyoshi & Kaito, Kiyoyuki & Lethanh, Nam, 2012. "A statistical deterioration forecasting method using hidden Markov model for infrastructure management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 544-561.
    18. Kuhn, Kenneth D. & Madanat, Samer M., 2005. "Robust Maintenance Policies in Asset Management," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt00z6g3pr, University of California Transportation Center.
    19. Ouyang, Yanfeng & Madanat, Samer, 2006. "An analytical solution for the finite-horizon pavement resurfacing planning problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 767-778, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social and Behavioral Sciences;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt2jj604pk. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.