IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/uctcwp/qt1km115qr.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Survey versus Route-Based Wayfinding in Unfamiliar Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Golledge, Reginald G.
  • Dougherty, Valerie
  • Bell, Scott

Abstract

An interesting controversy has recently arisen regarding the relative effectiveness of map based versus route based environmental learning. Although spatial theory suggests that map based (survey) knowledge should be more effective, recent research shows some contrary results. In this paper we describe an experiment in which subjects learn either from a map or a computer simulation (pseudo-virtual reality) of an environment. Tests of route reproduction, cue location, orientation and directional knowledge are undertaken. Results confirm the superiority of survey learning procedures, but interesting differences are found with respect to gender and geographic background of subjects.

Suggested Citation

  • Golledge, Reginald G. & Dougherty, Valerie & Bell, Scott, 1993. "Survey versus Route-Based Wayfinding in Unfamiliar Environments," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1km115qr, University of California Transportation Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt1km115qr
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1km115qr.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carlos Carbonell-Carrera & Jose Luis Saorin & Stephany Hess-Medler, 2020. "Spatial Orientation Skill for Landscape Architecture Education and Professional Practice," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social and Behavioral Sciences;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt1km115qr. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.