IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt9w49t05r.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Travlnfo Field Operational Test Evaluation: Target Study Final Results

Author

Listed:
  • Koo, Ronald
  • Yim, Youngbin

Abstract

This paper presents the final results of the Target Study conducted for the evaluation of the Travinfo Field Operational Test. Four waves of telephone surveys were conducted in 1997 and 1998 among commuters shortly after major incidents on a selected corridor. The case study corridor is a 16 mile segment of US 101 serving major cities between San Francisco and San Jose.The commuter surveys were aimed at an understanding of travel behavior when major incidents occur. The results of the surveys suggest that traveler behavior is not greatly affected by individual incidents causing delays of less than 15 minutes. Although a fair portion of commuters listen to radio traffic reports, they do not often modify their travel behavior in response. In general, commuters do not believe that changing their travel plans will result in shorter travel time. Commuters tend to believe that their normal travel plans are faster than or as fast as alternate plans; however, they value traffic information more for the intangible benefits, such as the ability to reduce anxiety or stress. A 12 minute delay for a 35 minute commute might not be a strong enough incentive to shift mode or switch route because alternatives would not necessarily offer shorter travel time when encountering congestion due to an incident.

Suggested Citation

  • Koo, Ronald & Yim, Youngbin, 2000. "Travlnfo Field Operational Test Evaluation: Target Study Final Results," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt9w49t05r, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt9w49t05r
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/9w49t05r.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt9w49t05r. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.