IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt3fh5q4dk.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Oakland Chinatown Pedestrian Scramble: An Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Bechtel, Allyson K
  • MacLeod, Kara E
  • Ragland, David R

Abstract

In 2002, the City of Oakland, California implemented a scramble signal, at the intersection of 8th Street and Webster Street. Scrambles are a type of traffic signal that give pedestrians exclusive access to an intersection by stopping vehicular traffic on all approaches, allowing pedestrians to cross diagonally or conventionally. The primary objective of this evaluation was to determine whether the installation of the pedestrian scramble at this location increased pedestrian safety. An analysis was conducted of pedestrian-vehicle conflicts and pedestrian violations occurring at the intersection before and after the signal was modified, and pedestrians were surveyed to ascertain public attitude toward and comprehension of the change. The modification to scramble signal phasing at the intersection resulted in a statistically significant decrease in conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles, and a statistically significant increase in pedestrian violations. In general, pedestrians understood the change in the way the intersection operated, and were accepting of the change to scramble signalization. These results suggest that the scramble has been effective overall in improving safety conditions at the site. The increased number of violations occurring despite decreased conflicts is in part due to a proportion of pedestrians who cross illegally on the "safe side" crosswalk (i.e. the crosswalk parallel to moving traffic where there are no opportunities for conflicts). It is important that the scramble signal be monitored over time in order to quantify the extent to which reduced vehicle-pedestrian conflicts associated with the scramble translate into measurable reductions in pedestrian injuries and fatalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Bechtel, Allyson K & MacLeod, Kara E & Ragland, David R, 2003. "Oakland Chinatown Pedestrian Scramble: An Evaluation," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3fh5q4dk, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt3fh5q4dk
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/3fh5q4dk.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Li & Chen, Cynthia & Ewing, Reid, 2014. "The relative effectiveness of signal related pedestrian countermeasures at urban intersections—Lessons from a New York City case study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 69-78.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt3fh5q4dk. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.