IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt37f8q3xh.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ventura/Lompoc Smart Card Demonstration Evaluation: Final Report Volume 1 Technical Performance, User Response, and Institutional Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Giuliano, Genevieve
  • Moore, II, James E.
  • Golob, Jacqueline

Abstract

This report presents evaluation results of the Smart Card Phase III FieldDemonstration. Its purpose is to demonstrate the feasibility of using Smart Cards and othertechnology to provide an integrated fare medium across several transit operators. TheDemonstration took place from May 1995 through June 1997, and it was located in VenturaCounty, California. Participants included seven transit agencies, with the Ventura CountyTransportation Commission acting as the lead local agency. The technology deployed is anintegrated fare transaction and vehicle management/monitoring system, termed FareTransVMS. Major system elements include smart passenger fare cards, fare transactionhardware and software, automatic passenger counters, a geo-positioning system, andassociated communications hardware and software.The evaluation addressed technical performance, user response, and institutionalissues. Many problems were encountered in installing and deploying the hardware andsoftware, and equipment failures continued throughout the demonstration. Communicationsproblems prevented complete deployment of the system and implementation of all plannedsupport functions, though most technical elements were ultimately put into revenue servicein the field. Technical problems were often the outcome of institutional issues. The systemwas deployed before adequate testing could take place. Problems at specific sites were dueto inadequate training, lack of maintenance and trouble-shooting procedures, etc. AlthoughSmart Card users were very satisfied with the new fare medium, few transit users boughtand used the cards. Transit patrons in Ventura County have very low incomes, and manyare not English speakers. Smart Cards are more attractive to higher income, discretionaryriders. Overall, the demonstration suffered from the absence of clear roles andresponsibilities, as well as a lack of understanding of the complexity and demands of thetechnology. Despite deployment problems, however, participating agencies were generallyenthusiastic about the FareTrans VMS, and ultimately it became a permanent part of transitoperations in the county.

Suggested Citation

  • Giuliano, Genevieve & Moore, II, James E. & Golob, Jacqueline, 1999. "Ventura/Lompoc Smart Card Demonstration Evaluation: Final Report Volume 1 Technical Performance, User Response, and Institutional Analysis," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt37f8q3xh, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt37f8q3xh
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/37f8q3xh.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chira-Chavala, Ted & Coifman, Benjamin, 1996. "Impacts Of Smart Cards On Transit Operators: Evaluation Of I-110 Corridor Smart Card Demonstration Project," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2x38331z, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt37f8q3xh. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.