IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt2679828b.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mobility on Demand (MOD) Demonstration: Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) Ventra-Divvy Integration Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Cohen, Adam
  • Shaheen, Susan
  • Broader, Jacquelyn
  • Martin, Elliot

Abstract

The Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA) Mobility on Demand (MOD) Sandbox Program provides a venue through which integrated MOD concepts and strategies, supported through local partnerships, are demonstrated in real-world settings. This case study documents lessons learned from the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) MOD Sandbox Demonstration, called Ventra–Divvy Integration. The case study is a part of an independent evaluation of the MOD Sandbox Demonstrations sponsored by the USDOT Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office (ITS JPO) and FTA. The case study includes background on CTA’s MOD Sandbox Demonstration, technical and institutional challenges encountered in the demonstration’s first phase, payment integration and unbanked access as part of the second phase of the demonstration, and discussion of lessons learned and recommended practices identified from this demonstration.

Suggested Citation

  • Cohen, Adam & Shaheen, Susan & Broader, Jacquelyn & Martin, Elliot, 2021. "Mobility on Demand (MOD) Demonstration: Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) Ventra-Divvy Integration Case Study," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2679828b, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt2679828b
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/2679828b.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zinette Bergman & Nicolas Allenspach & Manfred Max Bergman, 2024. "A Tale of Two Divvys: The Bicycle Sharing System of Chicago," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-20, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Engineering; Mobility on Demand; MOD; sandbox; shared mobility; mobility as a service; independent evaluation; bikesharing; micromobility; payment; integration;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt2679828b. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.