Author
Listed:
- Carlos, Cruz
- Mancio, Mauricio
- Shomglin, Kome
- Harvey, John
- Monteiro, Paolo
- Ali, Abdikarim Timir
Abstract
A great deal of work on alkali-silica reactivity (ASR) has been reported since1940. ASR is a reaction in which certain aggregates react with the highly alkaline pore solution of concrete. As the name of the reaction implies, the reactive aggregate contains silica. However, not all siliceous aggregates are reactive.In general, the aggregates that cause harmful reactions in concrete are those containing amorphous silica (glasses and opal), unstable crystalline polymorphs of silica (cristobalite and tridymite), poorly crystalline forms of silica (andesite and rhyolite), and microcrystalline quartz-bearing rocks (quartzite and greywacke). The highly alkaline pore fluids of concrete are able to depolymerize the reactive silica present in the aggregates, forming products of different compositions in the concrete pores. In the presence of moisture, the reaction products (gel products) change in volume and may expand to such a degree that the concrete tensile strength is reached and the material cracks. The cracks allow water to enter the material, thus affecting its integrity, and several processes of deterioration may take place.Alkali-silica reactivity of aggregates in California may create problems if no preventative measures are used. Some tests used to screen aggregates for potential alkali-silica reactivity are ASTM C 1260 and ASTM C 1293. Both tests are accelerated test methods, meaning that the tests put the materials in conditions that increase the rate of reaction compared to the rate at which it would occur in the field. In some cases, accelerated tests may cause reactions that would not occur in the field.ASTM C 1260 is aggressive because of the high temperature and the high concentration of hydroxide used in the test. A criticism of ASTM C 1260 is that it may classify good aggregates as reactive. Results are obtained from ASTM C 1260 in 14 days.A more realistic, yet still accelerated test is ASTM C 1293. The lower concentration of hydroxide and the lower temperature at which the test is run are not as aggressive as the ASTM C 1260 conditions. ASTM C 1293 is also considered to be more representative of actual field conditions since the test is performed on concrete specimens, unlike ASTM C 1260, which is performed on mortar specimens. However, the major drawback of this test is that it requires a year to complete.ASTM C 1293 requires high-alkali content cement. This cement was difficult to find in the Western region of the United States, and had to be shipped from Pennsylvania. In addition to problems caused by the lack of a readily available local source for this cement, the cost of shipping such a material from the east coast imposes a substantial cost burden. Because of these two factors, a replicate set of the experiment was preformed following ASTM C 1293, but with the substitution of low-alkali cement for high-alkali cement. Sodium hydroxide was added to increase the cement alkali content to 1.25 percent, which is exactly the same amount that is required for the unmodified version of ASTM C 1293. The mixing procedures were performed according to ASTM C 192.The Partnered Pavement Research Center has previously reported results for several California cements and aggregates using ASTM C 1260.
Suggested Citation
Carlos, Cruz & Mancio, Mauricio & Shomglin, Kome & Harvey, John & Monteiro, Paolo & Ali, Abdikarim Timir, 2004.
"Accelerated Laboratory Testing for Alkali-Silica Reaction Using ASTM 1293 and Comparison with ASTM 1260,"
Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series
qt7nq1s7x1, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
Handle:
RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt7nq1s7x1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt7nq1s7x1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.