IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt6qb3d9dx.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pavement Recycling: Literature Review on Shrinkage Crack Mitigation in Cement-Stabilized Pavement Layers

Author

Listed:
  • Louw, S.
  • Jones, D.

Abstract

The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has been using full-depth reclamation (FDR) as a rehabilitation strategy since 2001. Most projects to date have used a combination of foamed asphalt and portland cement as the stabilizing agent. Recently, the increasing cost of asphalt binder coupled with the relatively complex mix-design procedure for foamed asphalt has generated interest in the use of portland cement alone as an alternative stabilizing agent, where appropriate. However, shrinkage cracking associated with the hydration and curing of the cement-stabilized layers remains a concern, especially with regard to crack reflection through asphalt concrete surfacings and the related problems caused by water ingress. Considerable research has been undertaken on crack mitigation, and a range of measures related to improved mix designs and construction practices have been implemented by road agencies. One of the most promising measures, used in conjunction with appropriate mix designs, is that of microcracking the cement-treated layer between 24 and 72 hours after construction. In theory, this action creates a fine network of cracks in the layer that limit or prevent the wider and more severe block cracks typical of cement-treated layers. Limited research to assess microcracking as a crack mitigation measure has been completed on a number of projects in Texas, Utah, and New Hampshire. Recommendations from these studies have been implemented by the Texas Department of Transportation and other state departments of transportation. Longer-term monitoring on a range of projects in Texas and other states has revealed that microcracking has not always been successful in preventing cracking, with some projects showing reflected transverse and block cracks in a relatively short time period, attributed to a number of factors including but not limited to cement spreading, method of curing, and interval between base construction and placement of surfacing. Discussions with researchers in Texas indicated that additional research is necessary to better understand the microcracking mechanism, and to identify the key factors influencing performance, including but not limited to aggregate properties, cement content, the time period before microcracking starts, layer moisture contents, roller weights and vibration settings, the number of roller passes, the field test methods and criteria to assess the degree of microcracking, and the effects of early opening to traffic. Early research into the use of “hybrid” stabilizers (cement with small amounts of asphalt emulsion, foamed asphalt, or synthetic polymer emulsions) indicates that these, in conjunction with appropriate mix designs, may further limit the severity of shrinkage cracks on projects that include cement-treated layers.

Suggested Citation

  • Louw, S. & Jones, D., 2015. "Pavement Recycling: Literature Review on Shrinkage Crack Mitigation in Cement-Stabilized Pavement Layers," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt6qb3d9dx, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt6qb3d9dx
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6qb3d9dx.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Louw, Stephanus & Jones, David D. & Hammack, Joseph & Harvey, John T., 2023. "Pavement Recycling: Shrinkage Crack Mitigation in Cement-Treated Pavement Layers—Phase 2b Laboratory Testing and Performance Modeling," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1720m3qt, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Engineering;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt6qb3d9dx. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.