IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt4bn4r7td.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Comparative Review of Hydrogen Engines and Fuel Cells for Trucks

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Guihua
  • Fulton, Lewis

Abstract

The concept of hydrogen internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) is not new, but has gained renewed interest lately, especially for heavy-duty trucks. Different from hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs), which represent a novel zero-emission technology, hydrogen engines are modified conventional engines running on hydrogen fuel instead of gasoline or diesel. This study presents a comparative review of hydrogen engines and fuel cells, based on existing reports and discussions with industry. We consider aspects such as vehicle efficiency, greenhouse gas (GHG) and criteria pollutant emissions, hydrogen fuel purity, vehicle attributes, vehicle acquisition costs, total costs of ownership, and new policies. We find that hydrogen ICEVs offer some advantages and disadvantages: advantages include lower production cost and potentially greater reliability; disadvantages include potentially overall lower efficiency (and thus higher fuel cost) and lack of zero-vehicle-emission operation. While the technologies could be complementary (e.g., hydrogen ICEVs serving as a transition technology toward FCEVs), they also may compete, with success for hydrogen ICEVs resulting in setbacks for FCEV market success.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Guihua & Fulton, Lewis, 2024. "A Comparative Review of Hydrogen Engines and Fuel Cells for Trucks," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4bn4r7td, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt4bn4r7td
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/4bn4r7td.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Engineering; hydrogen internal combustion engine vehicle; fuel cell electric vehicle; heavy-duty vehicle; zero-emission vehicle; total cost of ownership;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt4bn4r7td. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.