IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt460234g0.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Updates to CalME and Calibration of Cracking Models

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Rongzong
  • Harvey, John
  • Lea, Jeremy
  • Mateos, Angel
  • Yang, Shou
  • Hernandez, Noe

Abstract

The CalME flexible pavement simulation and design software program has been completely recoded as a web-based application calledCalME 3.0. CalME 3.0 retains the same incremental-recursive damage approach and the same forms for damage models and transferfunctions as CalME 2.0, which was validated using accelerated pavement testing data from Heavy Vehicle Simulator (HVS) test sectionsand the WesTrack experiment.The following enhancements and additions are all included in the revised program. First, the old software’s fatigue cracking transferfunctions for hot mix asphalt (HMA) on aggregate base, cement-stabilized bases, and portland cement concrete have been recalibratedusing a new approach for the calibration of mechanistic-empirical pavement design methods; this approach uses “big data” frompavement management systems, explicitly and separately considers between-project and within-project variability, and uses tens tohundreds of times more performance data than are used in conventional calibration methods. Second, the updated program also includesnew damage models and transfer functions for in-place recycling materials, including full-depth recycling (FDR) with foamed asphalt pluscement and cement stabilization, and partial-depth recycling (PDR) with emulsified asphalt and foamed asphalt plus cement. Third, theprogram now has been given the ability to model PDR using cold central plant recycled (CCPR) materials. Fourth, new damage modelshave been introduced for cement-stabilized bases and cement-stabilized and lime-stabilized subgrade materials to correct problems withthe models in CalME 2.0. Fifth, minimum aggregate base thicknesses were developed based on calculations of permanent deformationunder construction traffic. Lastly, simplified methods were developed for estimating subgrade stiffnesses (resilient modulus) based ondynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) tests, California bearing ratio (CBR) tests, and R-value tests.It is recommended that CalME 3.0 be implemented for pavement design, that the calibration be updated with new data approximatelyevery 3 to 5 years, that Caltrans traffic databases be checked before they are used again for recalibration, and that use of the recently updated Caltrans DIME database of as-built data be considered for future calibrations.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Rongzong & Harvey, John & Lea, Jeremy & Mateos, Angel & Yang, Shou & Hernandez, Noe, 2021. "Updates to CalME and Calibration of Cracking Models," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt460234g0, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt460234g0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/460234g0.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ullidtz, Per & Harvey, John T & Tsai, Bor-Wen & Monismith, Carl L., 2005. "Calibration of Incremental-Recursive Flexible Damage Models in CalME Using HVS Experiments," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt59m8m9m1, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. Ullidtz, Per & Harvey, John & Tsai, Bor-Wen & Monismith, Carl, 2005. "Calibration of Incremental-Recursive Flexible Damage Models in CalME Using HVS Experiments," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt23h2v3nz, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nassiri, Somayeh PhD & Butt, Ali Azhar PhD & Zarei, Ali & Kim, Changmo PhD & Wu, Rongzong PhD & Lea, Jeremy David & Erdahl, Jessica, 2023. "Evaluating Road Resilience to Wildfires: Case Studies of Camp and Carr Fires," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9w05v56t, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt460234g0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.