IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt41k1k365.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Automated Speed Enforcement in the U.S.: A Review of the Literature on Benefits and Barriers to Implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Shaheen, Susan
  • Rodier, Caroline J.
  • Cavanagh, Ellen

Abstract

Excessive speed is considered to be a major contributing factor to motor vehicle crashes and is thus an important focus of highway enforcement efforts. Automated speed enforcement programs have been widely applied outside of the U.S. to effectively address speeding-related safety problems. In the U.S., automated speed enforcement programs are currently operated in only 11 states and in Washington D.C., most of which are located on residential streets and not highways. Moreover, a number of automated speed enforcement programs have been discontinued since 1990. This literature review explores the potential benefits and barriers to implementing automated speed enforcement programs in the U.S. by examining the large body of literature on automated enforcement programs, including red-light and speed programs. It begins with background on the implementation of automated speed enforcement and includes a discussion of research on the potential safety and financial effects of these programs. Next, the legal restrictions to the implementation of automated speed enforcement in the U.S. are outlined. This is followed by a discussion of stakeholder support including potential concerns of citizens, special interest groups, elected officials, and governmental agencies. Then, an evaluation of key program design choices is provided, encompassing issues related to owner or driver liability, manned or unmanned systems, mobile or fixed systems, visibility, location, enforcement thresholds, program management, and revenue distribution. The study concludes with a discussion of major findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaheen, Susan & Rodier, Caroline J. & Cavanagh, Ellen, 2007. "Automated Speed Enforcement in the U.S.: A Review of the Literature on Benefits and Barriers to Implementation," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt41k1k365, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt41k1k365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/41k1k365.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lu, Xiao-Yun & Spring, John & Wu, Cheng-Ju & Nelson, David & Kan, Yuheng, 2019. "Field Experiment of Variable Speed Advisory (VSA) Final Report," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt5zd5h82k, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    UCD-ITS-RR-07-17; Engineering;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt41k1k365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.