IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt3m05r28z.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Improved Methodology for Mix Design of Open-Graded Friction Courses

Author

Listed:
  • Tsai, B. W.
  • Fan, A.
  • Harvey, J. T.
  • Monismith, C. L.

Abstract

This study presents an improved methodology for the mix designs of open-graded friction courses (OGFC). The methodology has been enhanced by the development of an Excel macro in order to suggest revisions to California Test 368, Standard Method for Determining Optimum Binder Content (OBC) for Open-Graded Asphalt Concrete. In addition to the development of the Excel macro, one of the primary objectives of this study was to evaluate the effect that fines content has on mix performance, which cannot be identified by the “break point sieve” concept or by volumetric properties. The proposed OGFC mix design includes two phases: Phase I: Volumetric OGFC Mix Design and Phase II: Performance Testing. The tasks required to perform Phase I include the determination of material volumetric properties such as specific gravities, voids in coarse aggregate in dry-rodded condition (VCADRC), and asphalt absorption. These must be performed so it becomes possible to select three trial binder contents for fabricating specimens for performance testing. The main purpose of Phase II is to decide the optimum binder range (OBR) according to the results of draindown, Cantabro, and Hamburg Wheel-Track Device (HWTD) tests. Two aggregates (Watsonville and Sacramento), three binders (PG 76-22 PM, PG 64-28 TR, and PG 64-10), two gradations (Coarse and Fine) designed to verify the fines content, and three trial binder contents obtained from Phase I were used in the Phase II testing. It was found that an increase of fines content is significant in reducing Cantabro loss, preventing draindown, minimizing the variation of Superpave gyratory compaction curves, and producing more consistent HWTD test results. Hence, it is suggested that the fines content should be part of the OGFC performance specifications. This study also demonstrated the accuracy of the measured air-void contents of Superpave gyratory-compacted specimens that were fabricated with height control rather than gyration control and with binder contents calculated based on the volumetric equation, VCADRC. A preliminary comparison indicated that the proposed mix design produces similar binder contents for conventional and asphalt rubber binders with similar gradations, and that unreasonably low binder contents it may produce indicate a fines content that is too high. This improved OGFC mix design together with the Excel macro developed provides a rational, accurate, and convenient methodology for determining OBR. However, further studies are required to establish the proper performance specifications that relate to field performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsai, B. W. & Fan, A. & Harvey, J. T. & Monismith, C. L., 2012. "Improved Methodology for Mix Design of Open-Graded Friction Courses," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt3m05r28z, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt3m05r28z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/3m05r28z.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsai, Bor-Wen & Harvey, J. T. & Monismith, C. L., 2012. "Evaluation of Open-Graded Friction Course (OGFC) Mix Design: Summary Version," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt2879t7j1, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammed Alamri & Qing Lu & Chunfu Xin, 2020. "Preliminary Evaluation of Hot Mix Asphalt Containing Reclaimed Epoxy Asphalt Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-12, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt3m05r28z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.