IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt2np2f69j.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Use of Recycled Asphalt Pavement in Rubberized Hot Mix Asphalt—Gap Graded

Author

Listed:
  • Mateos, Angel
  • Harvey, John
  • Wu, Rongzong
  • Buscheck, Jeff
  • Butt, Ali
  • Guada, Irwin
  • Bowman, Michael
  • Rahman, Mohammad
  • Brotschi, Julian
  • Yu, Justin

Abstract

Current Caltrans Standard Specifications for rubberized hot mix asphalt–gap-graded (RHMA-G) do not allow the inclusion of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP). This report summarizes the research conducted by the UCPRC in support of the Caltrans-industry initiative “10% RAP in RHMA-G,” whose goal is to evaluate the use of up to 10% RAP (by aggregate replacement) in RHMA-G mixes, provided that the research does not identify significant potential problems for durability. Five pilot projects were built by Caltrans as part the initiative. In each of the pilots, a control RHMA-G (without RAP) and an RHMA-G with 10% RAP were placed. The mixes were sampled during production and tested using performance-related tests at the UCPRC laboratory. The results of the testing of the mixes—including stiffness, four-point bending fatigue resistance, and rutting resistance—indicate that the addition of 10% RAP had minor effects on the mechanical properties of the RHMA-G. With just a few exceptions related to changes in the total binder content of the mix, the effect of the RAP addition was negligible compared with project-to-project differences. Modeling with CalME software based on four-point bending testing results indicated that the impact of the RAP addition on the cracking performance of the pavement was either negligible or comparable to project-to-project differences. From the constructability point of view, the addition of the RAP did not create any problems. The life cycle assessment presented in this report indicates that the addition of 10% RAP to the RHMA-G can reduce the greenhouse gasses emissions associated with the RHMA-G production (cradle-to-gate) by up to 5%.

Suggested Citation

  • Mateos, Angel & Harvey, John & Wu, Rongzong & Buscheck, Jeff & Butt, Ali & Guada, Irwin & Bowman, Michael & Rahman, Mohammad & Brotschi, Julian & Yu, Justin, 2024. "Use of Recycled Asphalt Pavement in Rubberized Hot Mix Asphalt—Gap Graded," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt2np2f69j, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt2np2f69j
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/2np2f69j.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt2np2f69j. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.