IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt0hx921n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Road User Charge Administration: Lessons Learned from Fuel Taxes

Author

Listed:
  • Jenn, Alan
  • Fleming, Kelly L.

Abstract

State and federal governments rely on fuel taxes to help build and maintain roads, bridges, and other transportation infrastructure. The federal gasoline tax has not been increased since 1993 and inflation, improvements in fuel efficiency, and an increasing share of electric vehicles on the road have created a revenue shortfall from fuel taxes in the Highway Trust Fund. Many states have begun conducting pilot programs for a road user charge, or mileage-based user fee, which would impose a fee per mile for drivers rather than a charge per gallon of fuel. Benefits of this system are that it is not sensitive to changes in drivetrain technology to electric vehicles, can be designed to be less regressive than a gasoline tax, and can be easily adjusted for inflation. However, implementing a new tax would have challenges. This policy brief summarizes findings and policy implications from University of California, Davis research that assessed the administration of the gasoline tax, including collection and distribution of revenues, to determine what barriers and opportunities might exist for a road user charge funding mechanism. View the NCST Project Webpage

Suggested Citation

  • Jenn, Alan & Fleming, Kelly L., 2021. "Road User Charge Administration: Lessons Learned from Fuel Taxes," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0hx921n6, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt0hx921n6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/0hx921n6.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Law; Financing; Fuel storage; Fuel taxes; Gasoline; Infrastructure; Mileage-based user fees;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt0hx921n6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.