IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt0142f99j.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Best Practices for Science Communication: Messaging and Reputation

Author

Listed:
  • Murphy, Colin W
  • Pellaton, Paige
  • Fuller, Sam

Abstract

Communication between scientists and policymakers is critical for developing effective policies grounded in scientific evidence. However, actual communication between these two groups is often difficult, due to differences in training, communication styles, and motivation. While numerous “best practices” guides provide advice on science communication, many of these recommendations are based on personal experience rather than empirical data. To remedy this gap in the literature, researchers at the University of California, Davis conducted a literature review of scholarship on best practices in science communication, with an emphasis on finding reports based on empirical data rather than personal experience. The researchers synthesized their findings into a set of best practices for science communication and considered how scientific reputation affects engagement in the policy process. View the NCST Project Webpage

Suggested Citation

  • Murphy, Colin W & Pellaton, Paige & Fuller, Sam, 2023. "Best Practices for Science Communication: Messaging and Reputation," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0142f99j, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt0142f99j
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/0142f99j.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt0142f99j. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.